| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104esqo$2fdr8$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: AI's take on my cipher... Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 15:20:08 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <104esqo$2fdr8$1@dont-email.me> References: <1049c0q$10d0c$1@dont-email.me> <8d7c7d9307d4b388e11acbd6cc67497bef8a93a9@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:20:09 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="529e07c1f136bad2f9465cf8886cac45"; logging-data="2602856"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/40OxWXZ0gKH6g/cDK5C/sojc3AY01lxc=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:uw1rCj66yz7pKLQ5YXU9fvKcqLM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <8d7c7d9307d4b388e11acbd6cc67497bef8a93a9@i2pn2.org> On 7/6/2025 11:41 AM, Stefan Claas wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> >> This is from Grok here wrt the following content: > > [...] > > Let's face it, nobody in the world would use your > webpage ciper in production, because security aware > people use encryption offline. Keep in mind that it's client only. You can download the page, turn the internet off and use it fine. I just thought it would be fun to be able to create links with ciphertext payloads. > So why are you still > promoting your cipher here, instead of using minicrypt, > which I asked you to test on Windows? Do you realize how busy I have been lately? Check out this 3d field, fly around when you get bored: https://skfb.ly/pyP9E Promoting it? Well yeah in a sense. For a certain reason... I just want it to be heavily attacked and broken by some clever person. That would be neat to me! Why would I use minicrypt? Has it went through proper and extensive crypt analysis? Btw, I never used GO. Basically, I like several properties of my experimental cipher. No ciphertext has any data sent in the clear. Aka, no IV, no sequence numbers, ect... A ciphertext is also bit sensitive. Any alteration to the ciphertext will make it decrypt into random garbage. Each encryption of a plaintext will be radically different.