Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<104esqo$2fdr8$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: AI's take on my cipher...
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 15:20:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <104esqo$2fdr8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1049c0q$10d0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <8d7c7d9307d4b388e11acbd6cc67497bef8a93a9@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:20:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="529e07c1f136bad2f9465cf8886cac45";
	logging-data="2602856"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/40OxWXZ0gKH6g/cDK5C/sojc3AY01lxc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uw1rCj66yz7pKLQ5YXU9fvKcqLM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <8d7c7d9307d4b388e11acbd6cc67497bef8a93a9@i2pn2.org>

On 7/6/2025 11:41 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>> This is from Grok here wrt the following content:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Let's face it, nobody in the world would use your
> webpage ciper in production, because security aware
> people use encryption offline. 

Keep in mind that it's client only. You can download the page, turn the 
internet off and use it fine. I just thought it would be fun to be able 
to create links with ciphertext payloads.


> So why are you still
> promoting your cipher here, instead of using minicrypt,
> which I asked you to test on Windows?

Do you realize how busy I have been lately? Check out this 3d field, fly 
around when you get bored:

https://skfb.ly/pyP9E

Promoting it? Well yeah in a sense. For a certain reason... I just want 
it to be heavily attacked and broken by some clever person. That would 
be neat to me! Why would I use minicrypt? Has it went through proper and 
extensive crypt analysis? Btw, I never used GO.

Basically, I like several properties of my experimental cipher. No 
ciphertext has any data sent in the clear. Aka, no IV, no sequence 
numbers, ect... A ciphertext is also bit sensitive. Any alteration to 
the ciphertext will make it decrypt into random garbage. Each encryption 
of a plaintext will be radically different.