Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:26:15 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <104gov4$2vsd9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <103897u$cpuv$1@dont-email.me> <103pnug$13e4d$1@dont-email.me> <mj76jlxcnu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <103q0r2$158i6$1@dont-email.me> <1041fl5.144o.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <1041t4i$1v9c$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <1043f89.nc4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <1044aqf$32b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <10466v7.qpg.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <104e24q$s3u$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <104enjs$2ef51$1@dont-email.me> <hqssjlx6je.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <104gk68$2dcf$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 17:26:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="04e0f655a160b373ed37f535d79bfb1d";
	logging-data="3142057"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191lKuC3+j7O8T6T3v38+xS1g4zcjtyZbLck95KAXkkGA=="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fuf3g3OLgK1lk9zN8oTW2nXaH4w=
X-Priority: 3
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512

Arlen,

> People like you who can't separate fact from opinion couldn't
> pass exams.

Just like you can't seem to seperate your *opinion* that the disapperance of 
the sd-card is to grab more of our money from it *not* being a fact ?

Thanks for telling us you do not actually have an "higher education" I 
guess. :-)

> But... and this is where your lack of education shows, this is
> also a fact:
>  Any phone without the sd slot is less capable than a phone with
> it, all other things being equal.

:-)  Yes, *with all other things being equal* that is also a fact.

> It's now about whether you use the capability that exists, Carlos.

I take it that that "now" on the first line is supposed to be a "not".

> It's about whether that capability exists.

No, it isn't.

Its all about *you* demanding that we should agree with you that it *has* to 
be present in a phone.

Newsflash: We don't.

> Neither you nor Rudy has the intellect to separate fact from
> assessment.

Re-read my first response.   Pot, kettle.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser