Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: AI's take on my cipher...
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 12:38:42 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <104h7o2$32pna$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1049c0q$10d0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <8d7c7d9307d4b388e11acbd6cc67497bef8a93a9@i2pn2.org>
 <104esqo$2fdr8$1@dont-email.me>
 <3e611d6e6188f4a2e1083eb67ae59cb515b78122@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 21:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="529e07c1f136bad2f9465cf8886cac45";
	logging-data="3237610"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/WvOcOHA+zejmeNTnddl0DWnWMBgaCe/c="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xJCg+yT73n2l0LeDDv3/fUHMf4A=
In-Reply-To: <3e611d6e6188f4a2e1083eb67ae59cb515b78122@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US

On 7/7/2025 7:18 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/6/2025 11:41 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is from Grok here wrt the following content:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Let's face it, nobody in the world would use your
>>> webpage ciper in production, because security aware
>>> people use encryption offline.
>>
>> Keep in mind that it's client only. You can download the page, turn the
>> internet off and use it fine. I just thought it would be fun to be able
>> to create links with ciphertext payloads.
>>
>>
>>> So why are you still
>>> promoting your cipher here, instead of using minicrypt,
>>> which I asked you to test on Windows?
>>
>> Do you realize how busy I have been lately? Check out this 3d field, fly
>> around when you get bored:
>>
>> https://skfb.ly/pyP9E
>>
>> Promoting it? Well yeah in a sense. For a certain reason... I just want
>> it to be heavily attacked and broken by some clever person. That would
>> be neat to me! Why would I use minicrypt? Has it went through proper and
>> extensive crypt analysis? Btw, I never used GO.
>>
>> Basically, I like several properties of my experimental cipher. No
>> ciphertext has any data sent in the clear. Aka, no IV, no sequence
>> numbers, ect... A ciphertext is also bit sensitive. Any alteration to
>> the ciphertext will make it decrypt into random garbage. Each encryption
>> of a plaintext will be radically different.
> 
> It's a bottomless insolence the way you treat me, always being busy with
> your constant excuses.
> 
> Slowly but surely I'm realizing why the bitmessage community calls you an idiot.
> 
> EOD.

It would be great if somebody took their valuable time to try to crack 
my experimental cipher. I would be grateful, indeed. But I would not get 
all pissed of about it if they did not do such time consuming things. 
Not at all.