Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: AI's take on my cipher...
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 14:31:01 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <104heam$342nj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1049c0q$10d0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <8d7c7d9307d4b388e11acbd6cc67497bef8a93a9@i2pn2.org>
 <104esqo$2fdr8$1@dont-email.me>
 <3e611d6e6188f4a2e1083eb67ae59cb515b78122@i2pn2.org>
 <104h80t$33194$1@dont-email.me>
 <621d76ebcef1c8f78f02a5fa9e1c27ae0fbfed8b@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 23:31:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="529e07c1f136bad2f9465cf8886cac45";
	logging-data="3279603"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zJDVG5kP2cwtfzSGyOkz+8EMkwJwYZUg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2TmTUKI9tXuV+johiY4Fzj2Rerk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <621d76ebcef1c8f78f02a5fa9e1c27ae0fbfed8b@i2pn2.org>

On 7/7/2025 2:17 PM, Stefan Claas wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 7/7/2025 7:18 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 7/6/2025 11:41 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is from Grok here wrt the following content:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's face it, nobody in the world would use your
>>>>> webpage ciper in production, because security aware
>>>>> people use encryption offline.
>>>>
>>>> Keep in mind that it's client only. You can download the page, turn the
>>>> internet off and use it fine. I just thought it would be fun to be able
>>>> to create links with ciphertext payloads.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> So why are you still
>>>>> promoting your cipher here, instead of using minicrypt,
>>>>> which I asked you to test on Windows?
>>>>
>>>> Do you realize how busy I have been lately? Check out this 3d field, fly
>>>> around when you get bored:
>>>>
>>>> https://skfb.ly/pyP9E
>>>>
>>>> Promoting it? Well yeah in a sense. For a certain reason... I just want
>>>> it to be heavily attacked and broken by some clever person. That would
>>>> be neat to me! Why would I use minicrypt? Has it went through proper and
>>>> extensive crypt analysis? Btw, I never used GO.
>>>>
>>>> Basically, I like several properties of my experimental cipher. No
>>>> ciphertext has any data sent in the clear. Aka, no IV, no sequence
>>>> numbers, ect... A ciphertext is also bit sensitive. Any alteration to
>>>> the ciphertext will make it decrypt into random garbage. Each encryption
>>>> of a plaintext will be radically different.
>>>
>>> It's a bottomless insolence the way you treat me, always being busy with
>>> your constant excuses.
>>>
>>> Slowly but surely I'm realizing why the bitmessage community calls you an idiot.
>>>
>>> EOD.
>>
>> Actually, what about this for starters? Just something to get my mind
>> around go and how it works:
>>
>> https://go.dev/play
>>
>> https://go.dev/doc/install
>>
>> I have never used Go.
>>
>> ?
> 
> https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/minicrypt/releases/tag/v0.1.0
> https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/minicrypt-CLI/releases/tag/v0.1.0

Downloaded GO and your source code. The non-CLI version:

https://i.ibb.co/rRwxJgx8/image.png

https://i.ibb.co/C5W63ffy/image.png

Now, when I get some more time today, I will learn how to compile your 
code. Readme? ;^)

Apparently the go compiler works with my command line as is. It already 
seem to set/mutate some environment variables.

https://i.ibb.co/Jjw02DjN/image.png