Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!dannyb
From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Landlord fines tenant for negative reviews
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 02:17:12 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <104hv37$s2t$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <104hh87$34ddv$1@dont-email.me> <104hoe0$35vmg$1@dont-email.me> <104htns$36p4f$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 02:17:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
	logging-data="28765"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: nn/6.7.3

In <104htns$36p4f$1@dont-email.me> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> writes:

[snip]

>> I'm pretty sure California has a law that invalidates any such clauses in
>> contracts and lease agreements as void against public policy. Business and
>> landlords can put them in but they're unenforceable.
>> 
>California has a ssensible and reasonable law about
>something? Wow! It must date back to one of the Republican governors....

nah, more likely a holdover from when it was part of Spain,
(or maybe.. during the Mexican period)
and no one in the last century realized the law was there
because it was in Spanish...

-- 
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
		     dannyb@panix.com 
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]