| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104l6nb$47tr$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Entwistle <qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz> Newsgroups: rec.puzzles Subject: 150. - DISSECTING A MITRE Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:45:47 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <104l6nb$47tr$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 09:45:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d98e42bd61340df291689f066f5cd464"; logging-data="139195"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18RwThsf3K2FnC87nsW5vMw" User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba git@gitlab.gnome.org:GNOME/pan.git) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JFksrYU1ybITZLizLojBBdjugmk= 150. - DISSECTING A MITRE From "Amusements in Mathematics" by Henry Ernest Dudeney (first published 1917). http://www.puzzles.50webs.org/pics/q150a.png The figure that is perplexing the carpenter in the illustration represents a mitre. It will be seen that its proportions are those of a square with one quarter removed. The puzzle is to cut it into five pieces that will fit together and form a perfect square. I show an attempt, published in America, to perform the feat in four pieces, based on what is known as the "step principle," but it is a fallacy. Dudeney then goes on then to explain how a suggested four-piece solution is not actually valid. In the context that was important, but presents something of a distraction. We are looking for a five piece solution. You can read the whole discussion at the link below: http://www.puzzles.50webs.org/various_dissection.html Describing any solution in a text based medium will be a challenge, but if you are happy to take on the puzzle and mark your own work that's good enough for me. Good luck, -- David Entwistle