Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<104l6nb$47tr$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Entwistle <qnivq.ragjvfgyr@ogvagrearg.pbz>
Newsgroups: rec.puzzles
Subject: 150. - DISSECTING A MITRE
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:45:47 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <104l6nb$47tr$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 09:45:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d98e42bd61340df291689f066f5cd464";
	logging-data="139195"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18RwThsf3K2FnC87nsW5vMw"
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba git@gitlab.gnome.org:GNOME/pan.git)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JFksrYU1ybITZLizLojBBdjugmk=

150. - DISSECTING A MITRE

From "Amusements in Mathematics" by Henry Ernest Dudeney (first published 
1917).

http://www.puzzles.50webs.org/pics/q150a.png

The figure that is perplexing the carpenter in the illustration represents 
a mitre. It will be seen that its proportions are those of a square with 
one quarter removed. The puzzle is to cut it into five pieces that will 
fit together and form a perfect square. I show an attempt, published in 
America, to perform the feat in four pieces, based on what is known as the 
"step principle," but it is a fallacy.

Dudeney then goes on then to explain how a suggested four-piece solution 
is not actually valid. In the context that was important, but presents 
something of a distraction. We are looking for a five piece solution. You 
can read the whole discussion at the link below:

http://www.puzzles.50webs.org/various_dissection.html

Describing any solution in a text based medium will be a challenge, but if 
you are happy to take on the puzzle and mark your own work that's good 
enough for me.

Good luck,
-- 
David Entwistle