Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<104llt3$7imu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject: Re: I Replaced My Linux System With This $200 Windows Mini PC -
 Here's The Verdict After A Week
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 08:04:49 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <104llt3$7imu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <104k2fh$3p7d8$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 14:04:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="93f9d8e3c9dddaaa8529f984436ee2a1";
	logging-data="248542"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nRcd7WU09Zaq7pn4v3+/YUSZWzcMY3hU="
User-Agent: Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qYX1/oeA805141Zyk5qJPFkJ2Nc=
In-Reply-To: <104k2fh$3p7d8$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On Tue, 7/8/2025 5:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> In other words, if Windows performs well on a given piece of hardware,
> it’s a given that Linux will be better. This has been verified so many
> times that it should come as no surprise. This is a hardware review,
> not a software review.

(Dak Wallen, Contributing Writer, We Always Have A Friend In Jesus)

4C  3.60 GHz  Q1'23  12W  1 Memory Channel  $128.00  (An N150 with higher TDP)
It's like an N150 that runs at 12W instead of 7W.

A 12W processor that does email. congrats!

The machine is $217 and the processor is $128.

I bet the archive manager on Linux will smoke with that baby.

   Paul