| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104llt3$7imu$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 Subject: Re: I Replaced My Linux System With This $200 Windows Mini PC - Here's The Verdict After A Week Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 08:04:49 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: <104llt3$7imu$1@dont-email.me> References: <104k2fh$3p7d8$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 14:04:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="93f9d8e3c9dddaaa8529f984436ee2a1"; logging-data="248542"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nRcd7WU09Zaq7pn4v3+/YUSZWzcMY3hU=" User-Agent: Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802) Cancel-Lock: sha1:qYX1/oeA805141Zyk5qJPFkJ2Nc= In-Reply-To: <104k2fh$3p7d8$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On Tue, 7/8/2025 5:27 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In other words, if Windows performs well on a given piece of hardware, > it’s a given that Linux will be better. This has been verified so many > times that it should come as no surprise. This is a hardware review, > not a software review. (Dak Wallen, Contributing Writer, We Always Have A Friend In Jesus) 4C 3.60 GHz Q1'23 12W 1 Memory Channel $128.00 (An N150 with higher TDP) It's like an N150 that runs at 12W instead of 7W. A 12W processor that does email. congrats! The machine is $217 and the processor is $128. I bet the archive manager on Linux will smoke with that baby. Paul