| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104lucd$959r$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: Video games Europe - Seriously? Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 07:29:34 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <104lucd$959r$1@dont-email.me> References: <104fsu0$2q0d1$2@dont-email.me> <lrpn6kpjp2red9p9mjcmp5op94v7jddicg@4ax.com> <104hoql$360cs$1@dont-email.me> <104ikpi$3f15i$1@dont-email.me> <104j71q$3jce9$1@dont-email.me> <104j8qe$3jomr$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 16:29:34 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4f594193388d02207547657eac5e2fa4"; logging-data="300347"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Uwi6RhIo362rmwgPpfqBf" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:maXOVjCb/BCjGMjWpfymifg5TXA= In-Reply-To: <104j8qe$3jomr$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 7/8/2025 7:09 AM, JAB wrote: > On 08/07/2025 14:39, Dimensional Traveler wrote: >> On 7/8/2025 1:27 AM, JAB wrote: >>> On 08/07/2025 01:30, Dimensional Traveler wrote: >>>> Re your last paragraph above, will NEVER happen. If a publisher >>>> goes defunct, it goes thru bankruptcy proceedings and all the DRM >>>> keys and code are _assets_. So can't be just given away, they would >>>> have to be distributed to creditors or sold to pay off creditors. >>>> And forcing a company to distribute against their will effectively >>>> destroys the entire concept of "private property". >>> >>> If a single player game that uses an online DRM server is no longer >>> usable because the company has gone tits up what about the loss of my >>> property. Does that not matter, why is it that the consumer is always >>> last in the pecking order? >> >> The EULA you signed says it isn't your property. >> > Well that's ok then. Maybe you could sign one that says they can sell > one of your kidneys? Make that "force you to sell one of your kidneys" and it would be closer to reality. Ownership is not just to ability/right TO sell but also the ability/right to NOT sell. If you don't have both you don't own it. -- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.