| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104p6ts$qvv$1@reader1.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!dannyb From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com> Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss Subject: radium dial clocks, was: Microreactors Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 20:13:48 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <104p6ts$qvv$1@reader1.panix.com> References: <104jmk6$3mvjl$2@dont-email.me> <20250708214607.a0cc2c6d256eaee08513b8c6@127.0.0.1> <104k13n$3p1gc$1@dont-email.me> <68701d73$0$17$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 20:13:48 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3"; logging-data="27647"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" User-Agent: nn/6.7.3 In <68701d73$0$17$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> writes: [snip] >I've read about the girls who painted the radioactive glow paint on >clocks, what a horrible way to go. I had a 40's baby ben alarm clock >disassembled at the antique mall where I work, on a day when two Kent >State college girls were in. They had with them a borrowed geiger >counter, and when I gave one of them the clock face to test, her eyes >got wide at the reading. She told me "I wouldn't be touching that if I >were you". I have a similar clock. Here are the results from a scan a decade ago: "I checked your clock today. The face surface reading is 15,000 cpm (Background = 50 cpm), and 58 microroentgens/hour (Background = 8 microroentgens/hour)...." -- _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key dannyb@panix.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]