Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<104p6ts$qvv$1@reader1.panix.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.panix3.panix.com!dannyb
From: danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss
Subject: radium dial clocks, was: Microreactors
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 20:13:48 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <104p6ts$qvv$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <104jmk6$3mvjl$2@dont-email.me>  <20250708214607.a0cc2c6d256eaee08513b8c6@127.0.0.1>  <104k13n$3p1gc$1@dont-email.me> <68701d73$0$17$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 20:13:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
	logging-data="27647"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: nn/6.7.3

In <68701d73$0$17$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Michael Trew <michael.trew@att.net> writes:

[snip]

>I've read about the girls who painted the radioactive glow paint on 
>clocks, what a horrible way to go.  I had a 40's baby ben alarm clock 
>disassembled at the antique mall where I work, on a day when two Kent 
>State college girls were in.  They had with them a borrowed geiger 
>counter, and when I gave one of them the clock face to test, her eyes 
>got wide at the reading.  She told me "I wouldn't be touching that if I 
>were you".

I have a similar clock.  Here are the results from
a scan a decade ago:

"I checked your clock today.  The face surface reading 
is 15,000 cpm (Background = 50 cpm), and 58 microroentgens/hour 
(Background = 8 microroentgens/hour)...."


-- 
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
		     dannyb@panix.com 
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]