| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104q80k$1bmds$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Barnes v. Felix, possible nationwide standard in use of force in qualified immunity cases Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 05:38:28 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <104q80k$1bmds$1@dont-email.me> References: <vok92r$2qb9d$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 07:38:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7bcbd574f32c3f344cee8bed99c15c74"; logging-data="1431996"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197ambTTGLGmAFRBsSogQgzZaxMQWQyic8=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:lQ7Jgip2Moe68Whi3rLTBcnzBrA= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >I like these two attorneys, trying to explain the way cases must be >evaluated given the twisted logic of qualified immunity, when an >officer's use of force is lawful, the circuit split on said use of force >(which is what helps to get a case accepted for appeal by the Supreme >Court) and speculation if their clients' actions in use of force or use >of deadly force could be evaluated using the same logic as used when >evaluating a police officer's user of force if there were a nationwide >standard. >I could follow some but not all of this. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E62MSnz9wdE >The facts of the case will infuriate you; a man is dead having been >pulled over for an alleged toll violation, then attempting to flee. >The officer had pulled out his gun, then jumped on the moving car and >shot the suspect, killing him. >5th Circuit uses "moment of threat" analysis, that AFTER the officer >jumped on the vehicle, that the vehicle was moving now posed a threat to >the officer justifying the shooting. >Other circuits use "totality of the circumstances" in evaluation, which >would consider what was happening in the moments before the officer made >the decision to jump on the fleeing vehicle. >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnes_v._Felix I should have posted a followup. Here's Steve Lehto's discussing the Supreme Court reversing the 5th Circuit. Well, the 5th had failed to take judicial notice of a Supreme Court opinion from 10 years earlier. This isn't new case law!