| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104tra1$264oq$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior
of their caller
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 09:26:09 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <104tra1$264oq$2@dont-email.me>
References: <101nq32$99vd$1@dont-email.me>
<EKKdnXZfl9Qpf_T1nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
<9dcab3b82e32f9eb8473f8bc5361ab2fbef8b8f8@i2pn2.org>
<104cud2$1r72a$2@dont-email.me>
<a346224cd5d8b4001580eb6e5ff8783e58c9b7f5@i2pn2.org>
<104e46s$28pqb$2@dont-email.me>
<960c2417e6f691b2b12703506c207990df5b39ab@i2pn2.org>
<104el09$2dpog$1@dont-email.me>
<1ca786773f9ff02718c66e082bbc4182b36732ab@i2pn2.org>
<104fduv$2n8gq$2@dont-email.me>
<4cb5d16be8d1e6549823f35081050e7dad462da2@i2pn2.org>
<104gi8j$2uc68$2@dont-email.me>
<152859a4a4ef31aa45580e873eb6970c34b97ef9@i2pn2.org>
<104hmb5$35gkb$1@dont-email.me>
<f12be9e3474cf08b01ae1a4381f77205bbac1da3@i2pn2.org>
<104i15g$36mma$2@dont-email.me>
<c0cf1db3b26b15b6b2df8a22e9f415c10aee59a7@i2pn2.org>
<104jcqn$3jrpl$10@dont-email.me> <104lb03$13ioh$2@dont-email.me>
<104lp8o$7l4q$7@dont-email.me> <104o662$18h8g$1@dont-email.me>
<104oj2v$t0u4$7@dont-email.me> <104qimm$1dpnl$1@dont-email.me>
<104rad9$1icss$3@dont-email.me> <104t4na$21rg3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 16:26:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7c3bdc0cb6dff22bb3ed47acf1f4bedd";
logging-data="2298650"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+EkmNkEs4A7JOsxYLqxaAB"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VXa+Wsty6Na6MpGH7d/+2i9dlHQ=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250712-2, 7/12/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <104t4na$21rg3$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
On 7/12/2025 3:00 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2025-07-11 15:25:29 +0000, olcott said:
>
>> On 7/11/2025 3:40 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2025-07-10 14:35:11 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 7/10/2025 5:54 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 09.jul.2025 om 15:02 schreef olcott:>
>>>>>> All Turing machine deciders only compute the mapping
>>>>>> from their actual inputs. This entails that they never
>>>>>> compute any mapping from non-inputs.
>>>>>
>>>>> At least one thing you understand.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this*
>>>> https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf
>>>>
>>>> *The Linz proof does not understand this*
>>>
>>> Proofs don't understand. They prove.
>>
>> It fails to prove undecidability when the decider
>> correctly excludes directly executed Turing machines
>> from its domain.
>
> That does not change the last sentence of the proof. Therefore the
> proof proves what it would prove anyway.
>
It completely invalidates the proof.
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
The fact that DD simulated by HHH cannot reach its
own final halt state makes the undecidable input decidable
as non-halting.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer