| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1052gji$3au6g$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:54:10 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 50 Message-ID: <1052gji$3au6g$1@dont-email.me> References: <101nq32$99vd$1@dont-email.me> <104cud2$1r72a$2@dont-email.me> <a346224cd5d8b4001580eb6e5ff8783e58c9b7f5@i2pn2.org> <104e46s$28pqb$2@dont-email.me> <960c2417e6f691b2b12703506c207990df5b39ab@i2pn2.org> <104el09$2dpog$1@dont-email.me> <1ca786773f9ff02718c66e082bbc4182b36732ab@i2pn2.org> <104fduv$2n8gq$2@dont-email.me> <4cb5d16be8d1e6549823f35081050e7dad462da2@i2pn2.org> <104gi8j$2uc68$2@dont-email.me> <152859a4a4ef31aa45580e873eb6970c34b97ef9@i2pn2.org> <104hmb5$35gkb$1@dont-email.me> <f12be9e3474cf08b01ae1a4381f77205bbac1da3@i2pn2.org> <104i15g$36mma$2@dont-email.me> <c0cf1db3b26b15b6b2df8a22e9f415c10aee59a7@i2pn2.org> <104jcqn$3jrpl$10@dont-email.me> <104lb03$13ioh$2@dont-email.me> <104lp8o$7l4q$7@dont-email.me> <104o662$18h8g$1@dont-email.me> <104oj2v$t0u4$7@dont-email.me> <104qimm$1dpnl$1@dont-email.me> <104rad9$1icss$3@dont-email.me> <104t4na$21rg3$1@dont-email.me> <104tra1$264oq$2@dont-email.me> <104vm2f$2ldm1$1@dont-email.me> <1050in9$2qkok$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:54:11 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7fdad1567031d7ff5341b6bd77eb3823"; logging-data="3504336"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YILMxSiU4v20uiUu1WXuN" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:XCt1mHUxcP9gQLQlXSDCDotl8gE= On 2025-07-13 15:18:01 +0000, olcott said: > On 7/13/2025 2:09 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2025-07-12 14:26:09 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 7/12/2025 3:00 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2025-07-11 15:25:29 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> On 7/11/2025 3:40 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-07-10 14:35:11 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7/10/2025 5:54 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>> Op 09.jul.2025 om 15:02 schreef olcott:> >>>>>>>>> All Turing machine deciders only compute the mapping >>>>>>>>> from their actual inputs. This entails that they never >>>>>>>>> compute any mapping from non-inputs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At least one thing you understand. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this* >>>>>>> https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *The Linz proof does not understand this* >>>>>> >>>>>> Proofs don't understand. They prove. >>>>> >>>>> It fails to prove undecidability when the decider >>>>> correctly excludes directly executed Turing machines >>>>> from its domain. >>>> >>>> That does not change the last sentence of the proof. Therefore the >>>> proof proves what it would prove anyway. >>> >>> It completely invalidates the proof. >> >> No, it does not. The proof reamins as it was. A proof is valid if there >> is no error in the proof. Nothing else is relevant. > > There are errors that you do not understand. For the purpose of these discussion it is not neessary to understand your errors beyond that they are errors. This group is not for those who want to understand errors but for those how want to understand more about the theory of computations. All readers need to know about you is that what you say is not the understanding they seek. -- Mikko