Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1052gji$3au6g$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:54:10 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <1052gji$3au6g$1@dont-email.me>
References: <101nq32$99vd$1@dont-email.me> <104cud2$1r72a$2@dont-email.me> <a346224cd5d8b4001580eb6e5ff8783e58c9b7f5@i2pn2.org> <104e46s$28pqb$2@dont-email.me> <960c2417e6f691b2b12703506c207990df5b39ab@i2pn2.org> <104el09$2dpog$1@dont-email.me> <1ca786773f9ff02718c66e082bbc4182b36732ab@i2pn2.org> <104fduv$2n8gq$2@dont-email.me> <4cb5d16be8d1e6549823f35081050e7dad462da2@i2pn2.org> <104gi8j$2uc68$2@dont-email.me> <152859a4a4ef31aa45580e873eb6970c34b97ef9@i2pn2.org> <104hmb5$35gkb$1@dont-email.me> <f12be9e3474cf08b01ae1a4381f77205bbac1da3@i2pn2.org> <104i15g$36mma$2@dont-email.me> <c0cf1db3b26b15b6b2df8a22e9f415c10aee59a7@i2pn2.org> <104jcqn$3jrpl$10@dont-email.me> <104lb03$13ioh$2@dont-email.me> <104lp8o$7l4q$7@dont-email.me> <104o662$18h8g$1@dont-email.me> <104oj2v$t0u4$7@dont-email.me> <104qimm$1dpnl$1@dont-email.me> <104rad9$1icss$3@dont-email.me> <104t4na$21rg3$1@dont-email.me> <104tra1$264oq$2@dont-email.me> <104vm2f$2ldm1$1@dont-email.me> <1050in9$2qkok$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:54:11 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7fdad1567031d7ff5341b6bd77eb3823";
	logging-data="3504336"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YILMxSiU4v20uiUu1WXuN"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XCt1mHUxcP9gQLQlXSDCDotl8gE=

On 2025-07-13 15:18:01 +0000, olcott said:

> On 7/13/2025 2:09 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-07-12 14:26:09 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 7/12/2025 3:00 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2025-07-11 15:25:29 +0000, olcott said:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 7/11/2025 3:40 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-07-10 14:35:11 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 7/10/2025 5:54 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>> Op 09.jul.2025 om 15:02 schreef olcott:>
>>>>>>>>> All Turing machine deciders only compute the mapping
>>>>>>>>> from their actual inputs. This entails that they never
>>>>>>>>> compute any mapping from non-inputs.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> At least one thing you understand.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this*
>>>>>>> https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *The Linz proof does not understand this*
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Proofs don't understand. They prove.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It fails to prove undecidability when the decider
>>>>> correctly excludes directly executed Turing machines
>>>>> from its domain.
>>>> 
>>>> That does not change the last sentence of the proof. Therefore the
>>>> proof proves what it would prove anyway.
>>> 
>>> It completely invalidates the proof.
>> 
>> No, it does not. The proof reamins as it was. A proof is valid if there
>> is no error in the proof. Nothing else is relevant.
> 
> There are errors that you do not understand.

For the purpose of these discussion it is not neessary to understand
your errors beyond that they are errors. This group is not for those
who want to understand errors but for those how want to understand
more about the theory of computations. All readers need to know about
you is that what you say is not the understanding they seek.

-- 
Mikko