| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1056d1o$8roh$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: druck <news@druck.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Chromium on Pi2 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:17:49 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: <1056d1o$8roh$1@dont-email.me> References: <104lq9r$88hr$1@dont-email.me> <686ef511@news.ausics.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 22:18:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6b0fafc92f19064f8fcb32540b5421a3"; logging-data="290577"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yDXY7C9qkIYRxT+yxla0h" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:kbbR+ls153s9uN6Unjagc55al9k= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <686ef511@news.ausics.net> On 10/07/2025 00:02, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: > The odd thing is that I ran Firefox on x86 with 512MB RAM a > couple of years ago and it wasn't nearly as bad. Have a look at the size of the executable "then" (which is more likely to be 20 to 25 years ago) and now, and you'll see why a 512M Zero 2 doesn't stand a chance. ---druck