| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1056eev$9e4a$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Chromium on Pi2 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:42:07 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 23 Message-ID: <1056eev$9e4a$1@dont-email.me> References: <104lq9r$88hr$1@dont-email.me> <686ef511@news.ausics.net> <1056d1o$8roh$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 22:42:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c3b7ac2c87729abac3264c06b8194edf"; logging-data="309386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18T6h0kElIUk0ui2T2VsMAm7N57SNEDa4o=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:X+GpCcTCYQiy3Hypwkuc/4BZXDU= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <1056d1o$8roh$1@dont-email.me> On 15/07/2025 21:17, druck wrote: > On 10/07/2025 00:02, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >> The odd thing is that I ran Firefox on x86 with 512MB RAM a >> couple of years ago and it wasn't nearly as bad. > > Have a look at the size of the executable "then" (which is more likely > to be 20 to 25 years ago) and now, and you'll see why a 512M Zero 2 > doesn't stand a chance. > > ---druck webkit webprocess is over 1GB on this machine now. Firefox process another 800MB Thunderbird another GB or so. I buckled and now have 24G RAM. -- The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property. Karl Marx