Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1056eev$9e4a$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: Chromium on Pi2
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 21:42:07 +0100
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <1056eev$9e4a$1@dont-email.me>
References: <104lq9r$88hr$1@dont-email.me> <686ef511@news.ausics.net>
 <1056d1o$8roh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 22:42:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c3b7ac2c87729abac3264c06b8194edf";
	logging-data="309386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18T6h0kElIUk0ui2T2VsMAm7N57SNEDa4o="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X+GpCcTCYQiy3Hypwkuc/4BZXDU=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <1056d1o$8roh$1@dont-email.me>

On 15/07/2025 21:17, druck wrote:
> On 10/07/2025 00:02, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>> The odd thing is that I ran Firefox on x86 with 512MB RAM a
>> couple of years ago and it wasn't nearly as bad.
> 
> Have a look at the size of the executable "then" (which is more likely 
> to be 20 to 25 years ago) and now, and you'll see why a 512M Zero 2 
> doesn't stand a chance.
> 
> ---druck
webkit webprocess is over 1GB on this machine now. Firefox process 
another 800MB

Thunderbird another GB or so.
I buckled and now have 24G RAM.

-- 
The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all 
private property.

Karl Marx