Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<1056ool$b965$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Chromium on Pi2 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:37:57 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 41 Message-ID: <1056ool$b965$2@dont-email.me> References: <104lq9r$88hr$1@dont-email.me> <686ef511@news.ausics.net> <1056d1o$8roh$1@dont-email.me> <6876e462@news.ausics.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 01:37:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a132095a4a5e93cc7b9f23cadcc3ede3"; logging-data="369861"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19sPxi2ga0TZ/nOlSsOIrETHuXS1POdGvY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:6zw7LdhDvLvkpREQCyMwglQ/x9Q= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <6876e462@news.ausics.net> On 16/07/2025 00:29, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: > druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote: >> On 10/07/2025 00:02, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>> The odd thing is that I ran Firefox on x86 with 512MB RAM a >>> couple of years ago and it wasn't nearly as bad. >> >> Have a look at the size of the executable "then" (which is more likely >> to be 20 to 25 years ago) > > No it really was only two or maybe three years ago and Firefox > wasn't that much bigger then. > >> and now, and you'll see why a 512M Zero 2 doesn't stand a chance. > > The Executable still fits easily in 512MB RAM, for some reason it > tries to allocate lots more RAM after starting and displaying the > browser window (which seems to work fine for a few seconds before > it stalls). > > It seems the RAM usage increased when they started using multiple > processes: > > https://erahm.org/2016/02/11/memory-usage-of-firefox-with-e10s-enabled/ > > Maybe on the single-core x86 PC it creates fewer processes and > therefore uses less RAM than the quad-core Pi Zero 2? The methods > of turning off Firefox's multi-process mode don't seem to work > anymore. That also shows how the 64bit builds use significantly > more RAM, which will hurt the 64bit RPi Zero 2 but not the 32bit > RPi 2. > There is also the issue that many modern websites are running memory gobbling Javascript implementations -- Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as foolish, and by the rulers as useful. (Seneca the Younger, 65 AD)