| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<105c7gi$1lci9$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: General Motors quietly closed the door this week on a goal to make only electric vehicles by 2035. Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 20:20:17 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 97 Message-ID: <105c7gi$1lci9$1@dont-email.me> References: <a7pe7kd53dvda90vj15e5k90ducth4ct6v@4ax.com> <klpf7k5kd49jgoo2gsfoa3ti798dbchclg@4ax.com> <1058rku$rk5b$1@dont-email.me> <1ltf7klta5gi28vbqbas3ckg16at9ivk7s@4ax.com> <1059a0f$v8bj$2@dont-email.me> <enbg7ktl4ml1pf2qc90pjf6pdrjajus9vo@4ax.com> <mds557F516oU1@mid.individual.net> <105au96$1cn5u$2@dont-email.me> <mdsealF6gioU1@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 03:20:19 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3be9b2abbe3be8eb0ec935e36649e72c"; logging-data="1749577"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Yq2heKfEZ98uVPAp3xRXL" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:hHL2R8oap9QNiFPTe/iewW6kcq4= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <mdsealF6gioU1@mid.individual.net> On 7/17/2025 9:06 AM, Roger Merriman wrote: > AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >> On 7/17/2025 6:29 AM, Roger Merriman wrote: >>> Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:44:32 -0000 (UTC), Beej Jorgensen >>>> <beej@beej.us> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <1ltf7klta5gi28vbqbas3ckg16at9ivk7s@4ax.com>, >>>>> Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote: >>>>>> I just sold my 16 year old, 107K mile Nissan Frontier with a 4 Litre >>>>>> V6 for $5K I suspect it will retail for twice that. I wonder what a 16 >>>>>> year old EV with a depleted battery is worth. >>>>> >>>>> Tough to go back 16 years for EVs, but Carfax has a 2015 Tesla Model S >>>>> with 170,000 miles for $9,999. A 2014 with 58,000 miles is listed for >>>>> $15,970. >>>> >>>> I wouldn't touch the 170K Tesla for any price, but the 58K car might >>>> have some miles left on the batteries, but I wouldn't buy it. >>>> >>>> Here's a 2015 Nissan Frontier with 68,666 miles for $17,995. I'll bet >>>> the Tesla cost a lot more new then the Frontier so it's depreciated >>>> more. The Frontier also has many more miles in it's future than the >>>> Tesla. I liked my 2009 Frontier and I would have kept it for the rest >>>> of my remaining life if it had a decent back seat. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> C'est bon >>>> Soloman >>>> >>> >>> With batteries the designs are apparently getting better about degrading, >>> it’s quoted that relatively few batteries are available for recycling as >>> they are largely still in the cars, remember that this reboot of the >>> electric cars is fairly young. >>> >>> And indeed the choice of EV’s isn’t great unless all you want is a SUV are >>> a few Pickups to be fair but estates for example you have 1 choice though >>> believe more are coming. >>> >>> Ie it’s a moving target as more choice and the design improves. >>> >>> Which is clearly expensive so if manufacturers in some markets can delay or >>> rather keep selling old technology that has good profits margins they’d be >>> foolish from a economic standpoint not to take that approach which is what >>> they are doing. >>> >>> Roger Merriman >>> >> >> +1 >> Yes, that is a question with no definitive answer: >> >> https://www.motortrend.com/features/how-long-does-a-tesla-battery-last >> >> Then again it's a significant expense when/if needed: >> https://www.recurrentauto.com/research/tesla-battery-replacement-costs >> >> I see Mercedes is testing a race car with modular changeable >> (pit stop quick) battery packs, but for many designs, >> including Tesla, the battery unit with many cells is a >> structural member and as such not trivial to replace. >> > > Yup most go for the “skateboard” frame design hence SUV being a good choice > for EV’s. The idea of swapping batteries doesn’t seem to realistically take > off. > > Are some local ish some non electric lines (trains) that companies are > experimenting with battery powered trains, apparently works well, clearly > an option for some uses, Buses are routinely EV’s now which makes for a > nicer experience ie not sitting in a rattling bus! > > Re Tesla and their market share, they had almost the entire US EV market so > even without Musk and old products line ups and so on, you’d expect the > proportion to drop as other companies catch up, as ever the danger of the > 1st to market! > > For example HMS Dreadnought was ordered after Japan and US which both where > building All big gun battleships, but UK industrial production being what > it was, HMS Dreadnought was built and commissioned first, and became the > name for the new concept. > > Roger Merriman True for all technologies. Just because the physics is workable, general adoption greatly depends on the economics, scale, logistics etc of fuel and service maintenance: https://www.stellantis.com/en/news/press-releases/2025/july/stellantis-discontinues-hydrogen-fuel-cell-technology-development-program -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971