| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<105ht1n$36s20$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.logic Subject: Title: A Structural Analysis of the Standard Halting Problem Proof Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 23:58:30 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <105ht1n$36s20$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 06:58:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9b17940e46cfbc33e640f3b7657335c3"; logging-data="3371072"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186sTGmbEfOAKHgYYNBK+Cm" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:g8XqCMAorDCeQex8J2cWD7X9rAg= Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250719-6, 7/19/2025), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Title: A Structural Analysis of the Standard Halting Problem Proof Author: PL Olcott Abstract: This paper presents a formal critique of the standard proof of the undecidability of the Halting Problem. While we do not dispute the conclusion that the Halting Problem is undecidable, we argue that the conventional proof fails to establish this conclusion due to a fundamental misapplication of Turing machine semantics. Specifically, we show that the contradiction used in the proof arises from conflating the behavior of encoded simulations with direct execution, and from making assumptions about a decider's domain that do not hold under a rigorous model of computation. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer