Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<105ht1n$36s20$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.logic
Subject: Title: A Structural Analysis of the Standard Halting Problem Proof
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2025 23:58:30 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <105ht1n$36s20$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 06:58:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9b17940e46cfbc33e640f3b7657335c3";
	logging-data="3371072"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186sTGmbEfOAKHgYYNBK+Cm"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g8XqCMAorDCeQex8J2cWD7X9rAg=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250719-6, 7/19/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean

Title: A Structural Analysis of the Standard Halting Problem Proof

Author: PL Olcott

Abstract:
This paper presents a formal critique of the standard proof of the 
undecidability of the Halting Problem. While we do not dispute the 
conclusion that the Halting Problem is undecidable, we argue that the 
conventional proof fails to establish this conclusion due to a 
fundamental misapplication of Turing machine semantics. Specifically, we 
show that the contradiction used in the proof arises from conflating the 
behavior of encoded simulations with direct execution, and from making 
assumptions about a decider's domain that do not hold under a rigorous 
model of computation.


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer