| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<105p5g4$lfj9$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:05:41 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <105p5g4$lfj9$2@dont-email.me> References: <vpi8p4$ncm$1@reader1.panix.com> <tcsi5k97km0n0tnv4f1qog955mn3pq3rk8@4ax.com> <6h4l7k5a3h5psn3o5r9j0gg8umr1a7rl4u@4ax.com> <105ed70$299i8$1@dont-email.me> <105he51$j1l$1@panix2.panix.com> <105m7dg$3kvh$1@dont-email.me> <havt7kp3lnm688uecktuj4kug5t2inat46@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 01:05:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="895c3d87d8f960b5d4c49fcec0e89df2"; logging-data="704105"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BCO7+Ixmnj7J+7JjHmGDbEIvX/HmQOyA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:DAjKaIK4Q2SOHHC+0u29dS5Qfjs= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <havt7kp3lnm688uecktuj4kug5t2inat46@4ax.com> On 7/21/2025 9:57 PM, The Horny Goat wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:19:59 -0400, William Hyde > <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Scott Dorsey wrote: >>> William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Irrelevant. Randolph was sick, possibly but not certainly from >>>> syphilis. Nothing heritable, at any rate. >>> >>> But syphilis -is- heritable, and frequently was inherited in the 19th >>> century and the early part of the 20th before Dr. Ehrlich's cure. >>> --scott >>> >> As I understand it, the victim is contagious for a few years, but then, >> though still infected, he no longer spreads the disease. So if Randolph >> caught it - and it is far from clear that he did - it must have been >> well before his marriage. > > Many US states used to require blood tests before issuing a marriage > licence and in most jurisdictions the stated reason was to ensure > sexually transmitted diseases weren't present at a marriage. > > This has been waived in most jurisdictions in the last 50 years. (At > least I didn't have to do one though for my own benefit did a medical > checkup late in our engagement) Blood tests were required in Texas when my wife and I got married 43 years ago in 1982. Lynn