Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<105p5g4$lfj9$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a
 Whimper
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 18:05:41 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <105p5g4$lfj9$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vpi8p4$ncm$1@reader1.panix.com>
 <tcsi5k97km0n0tnv4f1qog955mn3pq3rk8@4ax.com>
 <6h4l7k5a3h5psn3o5r9j0gg8umr1a7rl4u@4ax.com> <105ed70$299i8$1@dont-email.me>
 <105he51$j1l$1@panix2.panix.com> <105m7dg$3kvh$1@dont-email.me>
 <havt7kp3lnm688uecktuj4kug5t2inat46@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 01:05:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="895c3d87d8f960b5d4c49fcec0e89df2";
	logging-data="704105"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BCO7+Ixmnj7J+7JjHmGDbEIvX/HmQOyA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DAjKaIK4Q2SOHHC+0u29dS5Qfjs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <havt7kp3lnm688uecktuj4kug5t2inat46@4ax.com>

On 7/21/2025 9:57 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:19:59 -0400, William Hyde
> <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Scott Dorsey wrote:
>>> William Hyde  <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Irrelevant.  Randolph was sick, possibly but not certainly from
>>>> syphilis.  Nothing heritable, at any rate.
>>>
>>> But syphilis -is- heritable, and frequently was inherited in the 19th
>>> century and the early part of the 20th before Dr. Ehrlich's cure.
>>> --scott
>>>
>> As I understand it, the victim is contagious for a few years, but then,
>> though still infected, he no longer spreads the disease. So if Randolph
>> caught it - and it is far from clear that he did - it must have been
>> well before his marriage.
> 
> Many US states used to require blood tests before issuing a marriage
> licence and in most jurisdictions the stated reason was to ensure
> sexually transmitted diseases weren't present at a marriage.
> 
> This has been waived in most jurisdictions in the last 50 years. (At
> least I didn't have to do one though for my own benefit did a medical
> checkup late in our engagement)

Blood tests were required in Texas when my wife and I got married 43 
years ago in 1982.

Lynn