| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<10638l9$2gj29$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy Subject: Re: I have just proven the error of all of the halting problem proofs Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 14:00:57 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <10638l9$2gj29$6@dont-email.me> References: <105ht1n$36s20$1@dont-email.me> <eed26ffea811a639a76d0184321c57eafba746cd@i2pn2.org> <pI4fQ.147044$gKRf.71824@fx12.ams4> <105kvub$2q17h$1@dont-email.me> <105lg9k$3v8t8$6@dont-email.me> <105ljhk$9si$1@news.muc.de> <105lkj4$3v8t8$13@dont-email.me> <105lnn2$2srt$1@news.muc.de> <105lpsd$1mvr$1@dont-email.me> <105m9me$2phf$1@news.muc.de> <87frejvq2x.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <10633d2$2h0d$1@news.muc.de> <1063527$2gj29$3@dont-email.me> <10636r8$2gfp$1@news.muc.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2025 21:00:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f6f0403f57a8205f4bde00807733f3a"; logging-data="2640969"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19rxll3fH7UVL31GPz1vSLu" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:0d0yJVTLD8Rp4tatwPVB+f3iuQM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <10636r8$2gfp$1@news.muc.de> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250726-4, 7/26/2025), Outbound message On 7/26/2025 1:30 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The error of all of the halting problem proofs is >> that they require a Turing machine halt decider to >> report on the behavior of a directly executed >> Turing machine. > Whether or not machine M halts on input i >> It is common knowledge that no Turing machine decider >> can take another directly executing Turing machine as >> an input, thus the above requirement is not precisely >> correct. > >> When we correct the error of this incorrect requirement >> it becomes a Turing machine decider indirectly reports >> on the behavior of a directly executing Turing machine >> through the proxy of a finite string description of this >> machine. > >> Now I have proven and corrected the error of all of the >> halting problem proofs. > > No you haven't, the subject matter is too far beyond your intellectual > capacity. > If that was true then you could point out at least one single error in EXACTLY what I just said immediately above. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer