| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1065e5a26154e76b8b30291ee600dde0@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Actually... why =?UTF-8?B?bm90Pw==?= Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:50:22 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <1065e5a26154e76b8b30291ee600dde0@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="85643"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="ovTHZ/VLht/KDF1nKqB7PmGhjiyfUdv/DKd8kGKFjRY"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 8e58c9b6d1da98b6162b84d03d2307a6516add15 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$nhWbd106Ms4Ux0uqtmJSd.Yk1XjWXp86n2aiFaW5/fEUwY2.7Ym8C X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Now there's something that bothers me: using PFA address of a variable seem to have actually only advantages; I don't see any disadvantages. So why the compilers won't work this way? I mean: when a variable if found, instead of its CFA - 'LIT PFA' should be compiled directly. When a constant is found — 'LIT <value>' should be compiled, instead of constant's CFA. Do I miss anything, any eventual problem? At the moment I don't see any. It should work properly in every situation. Yes, the compilation will be a tad slower - but the execution speed can be significantly increased. --