Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years. Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 19:40:18 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com> References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com> <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com> <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com> <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="745972"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="hWiuCAeR3KEZYJfTvV11n0qrRi6oqW/zjvEZQQGun9A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: f685b96694175b2ad43ead343ead0a9c0082fe88 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$7NDX6evDQ/9KbFwwSL2yauEs9JX10DWV64xJyfMgOQdRd39ORkgKK Bytes: 6080 Lines: 95 Paul: Sad to see that you, an elder EE, keep glued to whatever you recollected in 30 years that support your FAITH in relativity. You FAIL to accept that relativity is based on PERCEPTIONS and UNPROVEN affirmations about what happens in a second coordinate systems AS perceived from a first one, at relative rest. Reason and logic are violated since the very beginning of the 1905 paper and posterior endorsements. You are FORCED TO BELIEVE that what happens in the moving frame, as PERCEIVED from the stationary one, is what MATHEMATICS DICTATE. Your blind faith in this pseudo-science has not physical background. It only has a mathematical one. And this applies, also, to general relativity. Your error (IMO) is your lack of understanding of the human psychology and the CONTEXT that existed at the time relativity started to gain ground (early XX Century). Let me resume this paradoxical context: 1) By 1900, development of macro-theories in physics was exhausted. No visible future existed for the physics applied to what was believed was the Universe, the physics of stars and the physics of the quantum world. 2) In 1899, Lord Kelvin sentenced that he envisioned the future of physics as just adding more decimals to valued that were known. Electromagnetism was just kicking off, and there were no predictions of practical uses for voice and video. Just telegraphy. The newcomer, the electron, was more of a curiosity than anything else and the concept of the atom (for some believers) was that of a pudding with a positive blob with electrons inserted into the blob. There was no concept of galaxies or a huge universe around. Quantum mechanics was 15 years ahead, and the know-how of how the Sun worked was ridiculously naive (Kelvin). 3) For any practical purpose, newtonian mechanics and thermodynamics were in a dead end, and THIS was frustrating and boring for the new generation of physicists. 4) Suddenly, the ADOPTION of E=mc2 opened the door for new brands of physics and chemistry, which facilitated fantasizing about how stars worked, how atoms-ions-molecules worked and FACILITATED that chemistry graduated as a hard science (around 1915), instead of a branch of alchemy. This ADOPTION, IMO, is what made relativity so popular (find out about Eddington, Schrödinger, Dirac, Born and many others). 5) The non-linear mathematical structure of GR, either in the especial solution of 1915 and further developments, SUDDENLY opened a door to explore such mathematical complexity in MANY ways. A pioneer on this NEW approach (for a science thirsty of new theories) was Aleksander Friedmann (1922), who developed one of the first cosmological solutions of GR which, married to the discovery of many. Many galaxies (Mount Wilson) gave life to generations of cosmologists, who then had equations TO PLAY about the universe composition and behavior. Add to this the findings of Hubble and the proposals of Le Maitre, and more TOYS to play with appeared for the new kids in physics. Not to forget Schwarzschild's solution to a special case of GR. 6)Add to the above, in the next 30 years, of the invention of the synchrotron and different cloud chambers, and the scenario to PLAY with cosmology, physics of stars and the quantum world was set to have fun for the first 60 years of the XX Century. But THIS CONTEXT dried also, what forced TO INVENT more and more theories, exploring both ends of physics (black holes, gravitational waves, BB theories, models of the quantum world like the SMEP, etc.). But, since mid '70s, all these fields stagnated. 7)As of today, and particularly for the last 30 years, physics IS RELYING ONLY on computerized models. No human is able to write and manage the extremely equations that SHOULD SUPPORT the building of physics. Instead, linearization of GR equations, statistical physics and GRAPHICAL parametrized solutions are the only tools available. As a PATENT PROOF of what I wrote above, the "detection" of GravitationalWaves is based on about 300,000 different GRAPHICAL solutions of the linearized GR equations, which are compared in supercomputers to what LIGO like giga-instrument CAPTURE (which are motions in the order of 10E-18 meters). Tell me THAT THIS IS NOT A JOKE. Finally, IF you are enlightened to see the truth (by being more knowledgeable about history of physics, social contexts and human behavior, applied to more than a century), MAYBE you'll understand WHY the falsehood of relativity caught up slowly but firmly. BECAUSE PHYSICISTS WERE CLOSE TO NOT TO HAVE A JUICY JOB within the physics foreseeable in the first decade of XX Century. Paul, please, learn more and think more. Abandon fossilized knowledge, which is affecting your brain. Open up your mind. It's not late for you, and even you might enjoy new perspectives. Relativity and related theories ARE DEAD. Technology is, today, the NEW PHYSICS. Dig it.