Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <11bHpZFFz_SBu0-vvnRxaeRh-6s@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <03d91192917665366eed4777e19eeaba@www.novabbs.com> <v9e72s$3fish$3@dont-email.me>
 <28e6191fe1b0d86de8d155cedeb6592c@www.novabbs.com> <v9fmve$3t7j7$2@dont-email.me>
 <1ba79173ec9450b5c84be28c9f1964c0@www.novabbs.com> <v9fojc$3t7j7$5@dont-email.me>
 <964f235bdecde9d651c4352ec86d1fea@www.novabbs.com> <GJV9qXRqd8YR9_jKHPyTEFOBplg@jntp>
 <7f383eca3ec4616e72373eac4d772e77@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: RJXKRIkfWq6FEG8Oi2lGfP_82bA
JNTP-ThreadID: XgGFOrcTXd5ZDEX07aa-LTy0U04
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=11bHpZFFz_SBu0-vvnRxaeRh-6s@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 24 22:09:33 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-13T22:09:33Z/8985955"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From:  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Bytes: 3006
Lines: 32

Le 13/08/2024 à 20:08, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>>   Should we believe EVERYTHING scientists say?
> 
> Of course not.  Particularly when expressing opinions.
> 
> “All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal
> more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic
> and argument than others.”  -- Douglas Adams
> 
> And when they're presenting data, consider how it fits
> in with previous data.  And wait for independent confir-
> mation.
> 
> Consider the Gran Sasso report of FTL neutrinos.  I
> doubted it because it didn't fit with extended SR.
> And I was right.

Yes, me too.
Although the word "doubt" is not strong enough.
Personally I laughed, and I said that the experimenter had necessarily 
been wrong.
It was for me as obvious as: "We have found a whole natural number that is 
between 9 and 10", or "we have finally found a natural square that is 
equal to the sum of two other squares".
It was physically stupid, but it was sad to cry (and it remains so), it 
shows that physicists have not understood SR correctly. They would never 
have said such bullshit.
Even today, many spit on me (why not) but once in their WC-toilet, they 
imagine that we will soon discover tachyons.
It's stupid.
The clowns are them, not me.

R.H.