Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 19:30:39 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <11dc2d582c25af0c97272bca23328d41d552e4c1@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vhtgec$1rdku$3@dont-email.me>
 <8a2aedd8383a84ceef2fd985ac0bf529e2a0eccf@i2pn2.org>
 <vhuv94$25ro0$1@dont-email.me>
 <be7b74a5d83b8ceebd1ec380bb57ff4190ec0cae@i2pn2.org>
 <vhv61v$25uqa$5@dont-email.me>
 <b75deca6b1a0631255cf1402ee83db2b266edd22@i2pn2.org>
 <vhvnvc$2aq7k$1@dont-email.me>
 <3fe6ef31f562e0ddf598de46cf864986ca909687@i2pn2.org>
 <vi1pul$2n5v3$1@dont-email.me>
 <9cb8aec671200bb6d71582fd607b876b7ec4c83a@i2pn2.org>
 <vi43br$3cllo$3@dont-email.me> <vi4ak0$3e1nc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi4b5d$3dq30$1@dont-email.me>
 <40292abc147fee5a7bdd264b69d34ddf2061e59d@i2pn2.org>
 <vi4upt$3hg8t$1@dont-email.me>
 <c43fe07653eac2a9cc0432a6e289bfa1307613f8@i2pn2.org>
 <vi6rau$3v0dn$1@dont-email.me>
 <0bc3cdc8c096bba16decd94ad2af85d35da9b7b4@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7jv2$377e$1@dont-email.me>
 <fd3b1465f1afb40960f5969b583b179a26291d6b@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7r4m$g2n7$1@solani.org>
 <40230dd1264c9ae6fc738d04d113662345016b18@i2pn2.org>
 <vi83pf$5s6q$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:30:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="235349"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vi83pf$5s6q$4@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2519
Lines: 22

On 11/27/24 4:43 PM, WM wrote:
> On 27.11.2024 22:14, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 11/27/24 2:15 PM, WM wrote:
> 
>>>> It it the successor for the SET of natural numbers.
>>>
>>> And that is nothing else but all natural numbers.
>>
>> No, the set is different from its members.
> 
> By what?
> 
> Regards, WM
> 
> 

It is a set, with set type properties, and its members are Natural 
Numbers, with Natural Number like propertis.

The set is equal to N, which is the name of the set, but none of the 
members are 'equal' to N, they are MEMBERS of it.

You are just showing your ignorance.