Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <12-BgXLXunZqplOuF7K9hz96umY@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Galilean transformation of time
References: <18176d5314f25cd3$42869$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: q04Uv-_kKFVsKaJ34V2pmhU2rak
JNTP-ThreadID: 18176d5314f25cd3$42869$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=12-BgXLXunZqplOuF7K9hz96umY@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 25 17:55:38 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2025-01-04T17:55:38Z/9163502"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 2813
Lines: 48

Le 04/01/2025 à 08:39, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> What does it say?
> It says that good/correct/proper/well tuned clocks should
> indicate t'=t.
> 
> Now, let's take another rule. We need clocks to be synchronized.
> What does it mean?
> It means that  that good/correct/proper/well tuned clocks should
> indicate t'=t.
> 
> It is not another rule, it is the same rule.
> 
> And yes, you're idiots. All of you.

Synchronizing watches means: I leave Marseille in accordance with 
Marseille time, and I arrive in Paris in accordance with Paris time.

If this were not the case, no one would be able to agree.

Obviously, this is impossible according to Hachel.

So we need a common ground.

How do we do it? Hachel explained it.

Python spits in his face, Maciej doesn't believe him.

We need a double synchronization procedure, one based on position (if I am 
at 3.10^8m I will not perceive the present wave instantly), the other 
based on chronotropy (two non-stationary reference frames have clocks that 
beat reciprocally faster than the other reference frame).

So we have on sci.physics.relativity a double problem of cretinism.

The first forget the first principle.

The second, the second principle.

It is simply divine, miraculous, incomprehensible and very beautiful.

Everyone spitting on Hachel (from the smallest cranks to the greatest 
Nobel).

"Then they began to spit on him and throw stones at him".

Don't laugh, friends, it's not funny.

R.H.