Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: DeepBlue <dan.koren@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.music.classical.recordings
Subject: Re: Best Burleske
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:18:45 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <1270c36167c7c3f2aaaf975667867d22@www.novabbs.com>
References: <f8c3e12e897265263a3c5458c2a01b72@www.novabbs.com> <7c5f90025c247fcd8fe97bfd0d8126b7@www.novabbs.com> <07fc5b9c18546937d9d26bf46eaf0337@www.novabbs.com> <8b6db38256cf0b7e03c17a36054275aa@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3503160"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="+LX6U+QEdxmX65G/ioNLHVfhXMvuBu5fNOpF5omT0G8";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$j56lut6.CchGzFAmiCTPbu9ikPL3A6TCyXQsvOlkPXdtWjGwAJNpq
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 9e00570fb1895deee7851c86c763dbf872b2557c
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2059
Lines: 43

On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 7:35:12 +0000, Zionazi wrote:

> So it appears, Gould‘s Burleske
> is rather not well-liked.

And for good reason. Can you spell
L-E-A-D-E-N ?!? He plays it like a
dirge, not like a "Burleske".

> Let me see ifI can hear this…

No you can't. You would have
heard it already if you could.

> the Problem with Argerich imo is,
> she Rushes too much,

How would you know? You don't
know the score, you don't play
the piano, and you have absolutely
no understanding of piano performance.

> Similar to freire… and they‘re
> both not really mischeavous in
> contrast to Gould - who is also
> really raw and dark…

And what makes you think the work
is "raw and dark" ?!?

Not to mention "raw and dark" is
is inconsistent with mischievous
(note the spelling).

BTW did you notice how slow Gould
plays it?

Can you spell B-U-T-C-H-E-R?

Time to remove the concrete from
your ears and flush all the shit
between them.

Ciao!