Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: "Back to the Galilean Transformation and Newtonian Physics" - Moshe
 Eisenman c.2017
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 17:38:42 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <1332c65c60f2879c7dee34dee33e6236@www.novabbs.com>
References: <85833f45090e93c972df5de38c6b5bb8@www.novabbs.com> <vk97qb$lh9o$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4140594"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$8PyXYbYdcPR8A3P1wZejMOXaN3zPiw8MWqINO992OpH5WEElTrD4u
Bytes: 2978
Lines: 42

On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 14:32:12 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 22.12.2024 04:56, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>> He shows that the Maxwell equations are invariant under the Galilean
>> transformations making the LT invalid.
>>
>> free pdf =
>> https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/Back-to-Galilean-
>> Transformation-and-Newtonian-Physics-Refuting-the-Theory-of-Relativity.pdf
>>
>> "Abstract
>> This paper refutes the theory of relativity. Previous attempts by others
>> were based on pointing at contradictions between corollaries of the
>> theory of relativity and reality, often called paradoxes. The main point
>> of this article is to indicate and correct the error that led scientists
>> at the turn of the twentieth century to formulate the faulty theory of
>> relativity."
>
> Another quote:
>
> A.5 Speed of Propagation of Electric and Magnetic Fields
> --------------------------------------------------------
> "In this section we will prove that the physical laws on which
>   Maxwell's equations are based imply that electric and magnetic
>   fields propagate at an infinite speed. In other words, if
>   the speeds of propagation of electric and magnetic fields are
>   finite – the following laws are inconsistent, i.e., they are
>   self-contradictory."
>
> The "following laws" are Maxwell's equation.
>
> So Eisenmann claims to have proved that Maxwell's equations
> predict that the speed of EM-radiation is infinite.
>
> Considering that Maxwell in 1865 showed that according his
> equations the speed of EM-radiation is a constant, and all
> physicists ever since know that Maxwell's equations
> do indeed predict that the speed of EM-radiation in vacuum
> is a constant, Eisenmann must be a brave person claiming
> otherwise after 150 years!
>
> And a bit stupid?
That certainly throws into question the value of his whole critique.