Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 12:30:45 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 139
Message-ID: <1354c4f96cdb0601b904306408b6bd22463ad1f7.camel@gmail.com>
References: <v3o2dj$jm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v3og6b$328ec$10@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3ogh9$pi6u$1@dont-email.me> <v3oi5t$328ec$13@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3oifv$psat$1@dont-email.me> <v3ojg2$328eb$1@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3ok3p$q2fh$1@dont-email.me> <v3ol8s$328ec$14@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3olkf$q9du$1@dont-email.me> <v3piaa$33gmb$1@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3plp1$v133$2@dont-email.me> <v3qsi6$354ia$1@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3r1pl$16gjs$1@dont-email.me> <v3r24v$354i9$4@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3r2pb$16lke$1@dont-email.me> <v3r39a$354ia$5@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3r3hd$1ahl1$1@dont-email.me> <v3r6mt$354i9$6@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3r7p2$1b63v$1@dont-email.me> <v3r914$354i9$7@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3r9ds$1b96e$1@dont-email.me> <v3rb52$354ia$7@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3rbaj$1bg3t$1@dont-email.me> <v3rc4m$354i9$8@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3rcgn$1bpcn$1@dont-email.me> <v3rcks$354i9$9@i2pn2.org>
	 <v3rd3r$1bsem$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 06:30:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9e19fa96b563737c16a53fa7a4d92a80";
	logging-data="1441175"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NM79nxFQirIU7mLFLjbD2"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cPAuYgYGyo/ubWUiMPqLkj93+Dw=
In-Reply-To: <v3rd3r$1bsem$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 7392

On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 23:14 -0500, olcott wrote:
> On 6/5/2024 11:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > On 6/6/24 12:04 AM, olcott wrote:
> > > On 6/5/2024 10:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > On 6/5/24 11:44 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > On 6/5/2024 10:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > On 6/5/24 11:11 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > On 6/5/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 6/5/24 10:43 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 6/5/2024 9:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 6/5/24 9:31 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 6/5/2024 8:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/5/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/5/2024 8:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nopoe, because it is based on the LIE that a pa=
rtial=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > simulation of a machine indicates what it will =
do after the=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > simulation stopped, and that the simulation of =
a DIFFERENT=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > machine tells you of the behavior of a differen=
t machine=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > then simulated.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > > *I will dumb it down for you some more*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulat=
ed by any HH
> > > > > > > > > > > > > such that this DD reaches past its machine addres=
s [00001dbe]
> > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > > I never said it could, you just are stuck in a bad =
question.
> > > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOU=
T
> > > > > > > > > > > UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
> > > > > > > > > > > THAT I AM INCORRECT
> > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > Then you aren't going to get anywhere, because I just d=
on't=20
> > > > > > > > > > care about that worthless claim. Only when you cross th=
e line=20
> > > > > > > > > > from talking about the SUBJECTIVE answer that HH saw, t=
o the=20
> > > > > > > > > > OBJECTIVE behavior of the machine the input represents =
to a=20
> > > > > > > > > > Halt Decider, will you get me caring, and slapping you =
down=20
> > > > > > > > > > hard with a factual rebuttal.
> > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > > *I will dumb it down for you some more*
> > > > > > > > > > > Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated b=
y any HH
> > > > > > > > > > > such that this DD reaches past its machine address [0=
0001dbe]
> > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > > But I don't claim that it can. I won't go to the effort=
 to=20
> > > > > > > > > > confirm that it can't, because, frankly, I don't give a=
 damn=20
> > > > > > > > > > because it is MEANINGLESS.
> > > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > > THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
> > > > > > > > > UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
> > > > > > > > > THAT I AM INCORRECT
> > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, b=
ecause=20
> > > > > > > > I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless cla=
im.
> > > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
> > > > > > > UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
> > > > > > > THAT I AM INCORRECT
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, becau=
se I=20
> > > > > > am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
> > > > > >=20
> > > > >=20
> > > > > THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
> > > > > UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
> > > > > THAT I AM INCORRECT
> > > >=20
> > > > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I=
=20
> > > > am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
> > > >=20
> > >=20
> > > THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
> > > UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
> > > THAT I AM INCORRECT
> >=20
> > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am=
=20
> > not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
> >=20
>=20
> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>=20
> *I will dumb it down for you some more*
> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
> such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]
>=20
> _DD()
> [00001db2] 55 push ebp
> [00001db3] 8bec mov ebp,esp
> [00001db5] 51 push ecx
> [00001db6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
> [00001db9] 50 push eax ; push DD
> [00001dba] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
> [00001dbd] 51 push ecx ; push DD
> [00001dbe] e8bff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH
>=20
> *Mike Terry would admit it if he would pay attention*
> *He is not a liar*
>=20
> *This unequivocally proves the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH*
> https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf
>=20

You have been solving POO H for 20 years !!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-halting-problem-explained-in-simple-terms

The Halting Problem ask for the program H that:
If H(D,D)=3D=3D1, D(D) will return.
Else If H(D,D)=3D=3D0, D(D) will never return.
Else HP is undecidable