Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 07:21:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <1373928244f778869985cb9264d778bed5ccf85a@i2pn2.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
	<WtY45o_2xWeSk0s5VFpkO7OO7b0@jntp>
	<bd225e98-2fa5-49d5-806e-f25e2c8f24da@att.net>
	<MyfajwdXdoZZDQyGfKtmPKpt08o@jntp>
	<6cc86827-def3-4948-9e69-a3fea9e86c06@att.net>
	<vagheo$24vpo$4@dont-email.me> <6SLKsYqqtl1spoN6trAGFCEcAxc@jntp>
	<valbld$33pko$1@dont-email.me> <CvvV1cSfPC3QJ3tElnVntHhM_ZE@jntp>
	<vanaic$3ge7i$1@dont-email.me> <nTstM2rqnAPVLSM935ZrojNuyoY@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 07:21:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="224886"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2234
Lines: 25

Am Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:34:14 +0000 schrieb WM:
> Le 28/08/2024 à 16:00, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>> WM presented the following explanation :
>>> Le 27/08/2024 à 22:07, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>>>> On 8/27/2024 12:36 PM, WM wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Dark natural numbers are larger than any visible natural number but
>>>>> smaller than their bound omega.
>>>>> Dark unit fractions are smaller than any visible unit fractions but
>>>>> larger than their bound 0.
>>>> 
>>>> Define visible?
>>>
>>> The simplest definition is this: A visible number can be expressed in
>>> decimals or binaries.
>> 
>> Can be? Or is? Or has previously been?
> 
> Is or has previously been. If not yet expressed in the system, it is
> dark in the system. But small dark numbers can become visisble. (They
> have been called grey numbers.)
By induction that goes for every number.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.