Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<14ef7000e489f3684eeeaa9d69a64b5b@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 05:03:18 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <14ef7000e489f3684eeeaa9d69a64b5b@www.novabbs.com> References: <vivjmk$1m4s8$1@dont-email.me> <a6e2eb95631b7c655d8f67ceecad9d0b@www.novabbs.com> <829d9004f20fdfa2f6d626a89ff1cfec@www.novabbs.com> <rfdj2l-c8492.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2130316"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$FOk0FX4tPrli30.JTVdZyucQmRbf6A1.2HH/JjA2fh8wTSSRhtqHq Bytes: 2820 Lines: 50 On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:03:57 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> Woof-woof, Arindam allowed me to post the background info. about rail >> guns in his 2013 seminal paper on the rail gun. >> >> >> >> Arindam Banerjee and Dr. P J Radcliffe >> School of Electrical and Computer Engineering >> Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology >> Melbourne, Australia >> >> >> >> >> Abstract—Recent experimental work on model rail guns shows very little >> recoil upon the rails for the static case, where the armature or >> projectile does not move. > > Of course there is no recoil in this case because recoil requires > *MOTION* > as in Newton's laws of *MOTION*, crackpot. Not so, ridiculous fool. Motion relates to velocity and momentum whereas recoil is a force measured by mass and acceleration. Earlier experiments using strain gauges to measure the force on armature had shown no recoil force on the rails. It was assumed that the recoil was taken up by the heavy batteries on the ground. Arindam made the power source off the ground and with the rails as one unit and verified lack of recoil in his first new design railgun experiment back in 2015. He made a complete set of videos explaining all in 2017. Those experiments conclusively proved third law violation. And first law violation. Out then with the conservation laws of momentum and energy, inertia and entropy. In with brave new world of reactionless internal force engines with Arindam's new physics. Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof Bertietaylor > > It is clear you don't have a clue what Newton's laws mean, crackpot. > > <snip remaining babble all based on ignorant nonsense>