Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<14ilfjhcgp8ceaouvp91cunef63el4rdib@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: "Washington Post Accidentally Admits Earth at Coolest Point in the Last 485 Million Years" Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:03:49 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <14ilfjhcgp8ceaouvp91cunef63el4rdib@4ax.com> References: <vd549q$ig2i$3@dont-email.me> <vd7j3g$u4fv$1@dont-email.me> <llqh7aFjmcpU1@mid.individual.net> <vd9rlv$1dcog$1@dont-email.me> <vd9v9l$jcf$1@reader1.panix.com> <vdce9u$1sjms$1@dont-email.me> <vdd3e2$22sut$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 18:03:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ca84411d71bef9683ce7d6167031418c"; logging-data="2425284"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+z6J8gFKFi2STvioP75IgIsZOv/+u4dZ8=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:OqNc1yLt+T3F2CBafak/ZW8Fu2U= Bytes: 2996 On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 19:46:25 -0700, Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> wrote: >On 9/29/24 13:45, William Hyde wrote: >> James Nicoll wrote: >>> In article <vd9rlv$1dcog$1@dont-email.me>, >>> William Hyde=A0 <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> of direct observation does not agree with this view. >>>> >>>> As to the current warming the question is academic, as the pattern = of >>>> warming shows us clearly that this is not due to=A0 an increase in = solar >>>> output. >>> >>> Is this a good time to mention the faint young Sun paradox? >>> >>> For people unfamiliar with it, is the question of how to >>> reconcile the young sun being 30% dimmer with the young Earth >>> having liquid water. All things being equal, the Earth should >>> have been well below freezing (on average) but it wasn't. So >>> all things weren't equal. >>=20 >>=20 >> Always a fascinating topic for me. >>=20 >> This is not resolved, but the most common idea is that the thick=20 >> atmosphere of the young earth, filled with CO2, H20 and possibly other= =20 >> infrared absorbers (NH3, for example) kept the earth warm. But there = is=20 >> no consensus on the composition of that atmosphere.=A0 Perhaps there=20 >> wasn't much in the way of greenhouse gases. >=09 > First we should not call it the Young Earth because that >is a creationist theory. I learned that when I searched on the >term. Young Earth Creationists believe (or believed) everything was created in 4004 BC, just as Bishop Ussher computed. But "the young Earth" is the actual Earth, just very very new. Many terms have multiple meanings.=20 --=20 "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino, Who evil spoke of everyone but God, Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"