Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: The truth about the Lorentz Transformation.
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 03:16:44 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <152fdece6d8ad07399662b8718f94e75@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2350613"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="e/c594/k+DpN5wgh4wNSTzdRTGbv1jGbBBUwvKr4Q3Y";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$QtnyuUk1zSm4anm2YAweKuVHuXfORuOU8hIeq80hRbB2aGZ1r4idW
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 429c285600844fd6252e8828c51a974f0457e863
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1363
Lines: 9

In reality, the LT is the difference in time taken for the transverse
and longitudinal beams.
Like with a river current, the longitudinal motion will be delayed more
than the transverse.
This is the difference that should have been detected by the
Michelson-Morley experiment.
As with water that is not flowing, we don't need these equations without
an ether.
Since relativity does not involve an ether, applying the Lorentz
Transformation in this context is nonsensical.