Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<156256844.748909906.434683.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:36:59 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <156256844.748909906.434683.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks>
 <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me>
 <1r0e6u9.1tubjrt1kapeluN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
 <llgckbF2sq0U3@mid.individual.net>
 <vcuupr$2pg09$1@paganini.bofh.team>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:36:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5b03ec72d189ff20aff548ae4c2b7c8f";
	logging-data="3548830"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GgT0YvD56K0sDq7blgFk8"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uQ9/Q0b3vDLa0W7XHmvkUse5/GY=
	sha1:RUbe/OXmQT2bF9T48BzLdGw/ZF0=
Bytes: 2090

R Daneel Olivaw <Danny@hyperspace.vogon.gov> wrote:
> rbowman wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:11:19 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:
>> 
>>> No mention of ALGOL, the ALGorithmic Language?  It was contemporaneous
>>> with both FORmula TRANslator and COmmon Business-Oriented Language.
>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALGOL>
>> 
>> ALGOL's impact on succeeding languages was much greater than its actual
>> use.
>> 
> 
> ALGOL60 was the language where a test of equality between two floating 
> point numbers was actually a test of "close enough for ALGOL".  If I 
> want to test for "approximately equal" then I want a different operator.
> How well did it handle character strings?  Any language which could not 
> handle them was a language I wanted no part of.
> 

C is just pathetic at character strings.

-- 
Pete