Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<156256844.748909906.434683.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:36:59 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <156256844.748909906.434683.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me> <1r0e6u9.1tubjrt1kapeluN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <llgckbF2sq0U3@mid.individual.net> <vcuupr$2pg09$1@paganini.bofh.team> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:36:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5b03ec72d189ff20aff548ae4c2b7c8f"; logging-data="3548830"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GgT0YvD56K0sDq7blgFk8" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPad) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uQ9/Q0b3vDLa0W7XHmvkUse5/GY= sha1:RUbe/OXmQT2bF9T48BzLdGw/ZF0= Bytes: 2090 R Daneel Olivaw <Danny@hyperspace.vogon.gov> wrote: > rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:11:19 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: >> >>> No mention of ALGOL, the ALGorithmic Language? It was contemporaneous >>> with both FORmula TRANslator and COmmon Business-Oriented Language. >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALGOL> >> >> ALGOL's impact on succeeding languages was much greater than its actual >> use. >> > > ALGOL60 was the language where a test of equality between two floating > point numbers was actually a test of "close enough for ALGOL". If I > want to test for "approximately equal" then I want a different operator. > How well did it handle character strings? Any language which could not > handle them was a language I wanted no part of. > C is just pathetic at character strings. -- Pete