Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: news@zzo38computer.org.invalid
Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.gemini
Subject: Re: Small web protocols / alternative protocols
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 15:42:13 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <1710714649.bystand@zzo38computer.org>
References: <1710522724.bystand@zzo38computer.org> <ut3h6r$2pgob$1@dont-email.me> <87jzm26ixq.fsf@ross154.client.etacassiopeiae.net> <baf41084-dd28-5bdf-6d2a-2dd0d23febf2@example.net> <1710635809.bystand@zzo38computer.org> <eb544742-8be9-eeab-8793-1c3eead680ba@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aab4684907932ea5fe40efa249f8f1f8";
	logging-data="3970588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18uKEr0y/OOKK6F6+qvQ9fc"
User-Agent: bystand/1.3.0pre1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:67OeQjEmGlXpJWWyhivvNSasJy4=
Bytes: 1524

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
> I like the idea of seeing goher and gemini as complements and not 
> competitors. Is gemini backwards compatible with gopher by design, or is 
> the idea to "pull away" from gopher eventually?

Gemini is a different protocol and not compatible with Gopher, although it
is possible for a browser to implement both protocols, and many do. They
are not mutually exclusive.

-- 
Don't laugh at the moon when it is day time in France.