Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1725384911.169978@nyx2.nyx.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Western Press Infallibility
References: <a0876da4b5de80c46ae8ec94523328e1@www.novabbs.com> <1725376903.209804@nyx2.nyx.net> <6d1a4b97079e2800dfcb41f59c45a23b@www.novabbs.com>
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
From: bmoore@nyx.net (bmoore)
Originator: bmoore@nyx.net (bmoore)
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <1725384911.169978@nyx2.nyx.net>
Cache-Post-Path: nyx2.nyx.net!4961@localhost
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Lines: 35
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:35:11 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:35:11 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2010
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Bytes: 2269

In article <6d1a4b97079e2800dfcb41f59c45a23b@www.novabbs.com>,
ltlee1 <ltlee1@hotmail.com> wrote:
>In article <a0876da4b5de80c46ae8ec94523328e1@www.novabbs.com>,
>ltlee1 <ltlee1@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>In article <1725108944.691998@nyx2.nyx.net>, bmoore <bmoore@nyx.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>You have said before that you don't listen to the Western press with
>> regard to China. Then you quote the >Western press as a reliable source
>> about beliefs of the Chinese people. Makes no sense.
>
>I still don't believe Western press as a reliable source about China and
>Chinese.
>Why? Simply put. Their reports are often not supported by evidence.
>
>In contrast, I have no problem quoting Western press concerning polls
>answered by CHINESE CORRESPONDENTS.

What if the polls reported the oppposite of what you believe?

>Especially those I could look at the polling organization's methodology
>and resultant statistics myself.
>
>In comparison, there were a lot of talks in the Western press on Chinese
>Debt Trap. Where are the evidence and associated statistics? In their
>absence, I have no reason to believe those reports.

What if the reports confirmed what you believe?

I feel like I am responding to illogical and inconsistent arguments here. It's been going on repetitively for decades.

Oh well.