| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1739255519-1263@newsgrouper.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!newsgrouper.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ed Stasiak <user1263@newsgrouper.org.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: The Problems With Immortality References: <voefgu$1g32b$1@dont-email.me> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 06:31:59 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <1739255519-1263@newsgrouper.org> Injection-Info: newsgrouper.org; mail-complaints-to="newsgrouper@yahoo.com"; posting-account=user1263 Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 06:31:59 GMT User-Agent: Newsgrouper/0.7.0 > BTR1701 > > Now, however, any arrest will enshrine your fingerprints and DNA in a national > database forever. If you're arrested again 90 years later, questions will > arise. > > As for employment, there's a gray market for jobs Most manufacturing jobs use finger print scanner time clocks nowadays, so there's the issue of some fly-by-night outsourced company that runs the service, having your fingerprints on digital file somewhere and who knows who has access to them, now and in the future. I mentioned this before, but there was a case in Australia where a company implemented bio-metric security system (using a retinal scan, IIRC) and one employee refused to provide his bio-metric data to the fly-by-night outsourced company that ran the service and when he was fired, he sued. His position was that the outsourced company couldn't guarantee the security of his bio-metric data and that had nothing to do with his job for his employer. The Australian courts ruled in his favor but it only applied to him because he was an employee _before_ the bio-metric security system was installed, new employees are screwed...