Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: General Relativity Does Not Rescue Special Relativity.
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 21:24:40 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <17622c57ad329ecb630575d92394b2d8@www.novabbs.com>
References: <aecb6e4bd2b86ebc457767da8cc40c02@www.novabbs.com> <vkPYO.4701732$1pff.4574957@fx05.ams4> <51913df2deed4fbbc7eb95fb07397186@www.novabbs.com> <S46ZO.4715827$1pff.310997@fx05.ams4> <2ae5e43140f7d9b3407008eea993c4ba@www.novabbs.com> <1RkZO.2$Dhn6.1@fx16.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2481832"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$tS/fRN1EUwti5SVMUVUW0ObxqcjQbAq6hnbmqDtD76O2GlUZw2HGO
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2073
Lines: 12

Paul: Kindly don't put words in people's mouths. I made no such claim.
Einstein is famous for making the stupid error of equating time with a
clock reading, and you follow lockstep. What I said is clear: because an
atomic clock runs faster in space, time doesn't move faster. Your
relativity is no challenge to debunk. It has been recognized all along
for facile nonsense. Clearly, atomic clocks aren't proper clocks until
they are adjusted. If time were to dilate, all rates of change would
change in unison, so the clock would necessarily have to change its
rate. See how irrational relativity is. So, you are saying time is
dilating (actually contracting because the clock is running faster), so
you slow the clock's rate to proper time, and everything else on the
satellite is affected by the time dilation and runs fast? Things age
faster on the satellite? That's nonsense.