Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 05:17:26 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Biden To Deploy U.S. Military To Gaza To Help The Palestinians: Report
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <usevpt$1m3o8$3@dont-email.me> <atropos-819800.11555208032024@news.giganews.com> <usgdhn$2079n$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F403B1.19081708032024@news.giganews.com>
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-F403B1.19081708032024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 104
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 11:17:27 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 5217
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17bb14857985b65a$1979$3078224$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5597

On 3/8/24 9:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <usgdhn$2079n$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/8/24 2:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <usevpt$1m3o8$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> President Joe Biden will reportedly announce during his televised State of
>>>> the Union speech on Thursday that he is deploying the U.S. military to
>>>> Gaza to help build infrastructure for the Palestinians.
>>>
>>> He wants to build a pier/port for Gaza in the Mediterranean. But swears
>>> this won't require any U.S. military involvement in the Israel/Gaza war.
>>>
>>> How exactly will this work, Joe? We're going to have several dozens
>>> ships and other machinery right there on the shore building the pier and
>>> presumably several Navy ships there to protect them, so what happens
>>> when Hamas inevitably starts lobbing missiles at all of them?
>>>
>>> When you're forced to return fire and break your promise that this
>>> pier-building wouldn't result in us involved in the war, are you going
>>> to then pretend this wasn't a foreseeable development?
>>>
>>>> Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David M. Friedman called the announcement
>>>> "a cheap political trick".
>>>
>>> It's a political trick, all right, but there won't be anything cheap
>>> about it, either in materiel or lives.
>>>
>>>> "Remember that billions of dollars of aid has come into Gaza over the past
>>>> 15 years and almost all of it was used to build terror tunnels and rocket
>>>> launchers. How will that be prevented this time? Won't a port just
>>>> accelerate and exacerbate this risk?" he posted on X. "And even with a
>>>> port, the humanitarian aid has to be loaded onto trucks to get to their
>>>> destination-- yes, the same trucks that Hamas is commandeering and
>>>> preventing from going to the right people!"
>>>
>>> Exactly. We're going to spend billions building this port for Gaza (a
>>> city that essentially doesn't even exist anymore, FYI) and when it's
>>> finally open, any aid that's offloaded there will just be hijacked by
>>> Hamas after it leaves the port.
>>>
>>> Which will then lead Biden to say, "Well, I know I promised no American
>>> boots on the ground but we didn't foresee the problems with the aid
>>> after it leaves the port, so now we need to send in tanks, APCs, and
>>> troops to protect the aid until it gets to the people." And whammo, just
>>> like that we're in a shooting war in Gaza.
>>>
>>> If only Biden put this much effort into securing the southern border
>>> here in America...
> 
>> YOU guys crafted the bill, then YOU guys shot your own bill down and now
>> want to pretend Biden is responsible for it.
> 
> Biden is responsible for the entire border mess for the last three years
> since he took office.


This is very confusing.  Trump said the U.S. needed a "border wall" and 
he'd get Mexico to pay for it.  Neither of these were accomplished so 
how isn't the situation entirely on the fat orange fuck you're in love with?


  It wasn't Republicans who signed 94 EOs ordering
> everything from cutting holes in barriers so that illegal could have
> easier entry into the country, to ordering the Border Patrol to refrain
> from stopping illegals entering the country.


Would it have been better if Mexico had paid for the cutting of the 
holes?  That's pretty funny!



> Pretending three years later that he has nothing to do with the raging
> chaos that resulted from his EOs, and it's all the fault of Republicans
> whose RINO members crafted a bill that makes the problem worse, is
> idiotic. But it's a brilliant trick if you can find someone stupid
> enough to fall for it.


Propagandistic bullshit.  Tell us about Trump's abject failures on the 
subject.



>> People aren't as stupid as you want them to be.
> 
> No kidding. That's why we see right through this 'bipartisan border
> bill'.
> 
>> Pretend all you like, we had a solution to the border problem.
> 
> Allowing up to 8500 illegals per day to continue to flow unvetted into
> the country isn't a solution to the border problem under any definition
> of 'solution' in the English-speaking world, other than, I suppose, it
> would be legalized under this bill so I guess you could claim they can't
> be illegals if their entry was legalized and that would give a victory
> in the language war.


It's all because of Trump.  Prove me wrong.