Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17bb293628bd4fe3$12$165553$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 18:36:36 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17bb0f6cf6d154ed$1$160734$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <usi3dc$2dme3$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> In-Reply-To: <usi3dc$2dme3$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 35 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 17:36:36 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1751 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17bb293628bd4fe3$12$165553$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2154 W dniu 09.03.2024 o 17:40, Python pisze: > Le 09/03/2024 à 10:44, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second >> As seen, the definition of second loved so >> much to be invoked by relativistic morons - >> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru >> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary >> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics. >> >> >> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt >> solar system is measuring the length >> of solar day. What is the result predicted >> by the Einsteinian physics? >> One prediction is - 99766. From the >> postulates. The second prediction is - >> 86400. From definition. >> And similiarly with the prediction of >> a measurement of a meridian. >> >> >> Thank you for your attention, poor >> relativistic fanatics, have a nice day. >> > > This deserves a prize for the most idiotic argument ever made here. Your rants won't change anything, the mumble of your idiot guru was not even consistent, what has been proven. BTW, have you already learnt what a function is? Or maybe "for any element of the domain" clause is still confusing you, poor stinker?