Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 16:07:01 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Biden To Deploy U.S. Military To Gaza To Help The Palestinians: Report
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <usevpt$1m3o8$3@dont-email.me> <atropos-819800.11555208032024@news.giganews.com> <usgdhn$2079n$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F403B1.19081708032024@news.giganews.com> <uskdm2$30432$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-0BC399.11050610032024@news.giganews.com>
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-0BC399.11050610032024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 100
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:07:02 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 5594
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17bb80004f59a21f$3$856620$cd54664@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 5969

On 3/10/2024 3:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uskdm2$30432$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/8/24 10:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <usgdhn$2079n$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/8/24 2:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <usevpt$1m3o8$3@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>     Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> President Joe Biden will reportedly announce during his televised State
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the Union speech on Thursday that he is deploying the U.S. military to
>>>>>> Gaza to help build infrastructure for the Palestinians.
>>>>>
>>>>> He wants to build a pier/port for Gaza in the Mediterranean. But swears
>>>>> this won't require any U.S. military involvement in the Israel/Gaza war.
>>>>>
>>>>> How exactly will this work, Joe? We're going to have several dozens
>>>>> ships and other machinery right there on the shore building the pier and
>>>>> presumably several Navy ships there to protect them, so what happens
>>>>> when Hamas inevitably starts lobbing missiles at all of them?
>>>>>
>>>>> When you're forced to return fire and break your promise that this
>>>>> pier-building wouldn't result in us involved in the war, are you going
>>>>> to then pretend this wasn't a foreseeable development?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David M. Friedman called the
>>>>>> announcement
>>>>>> "a cheap political trick".
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a political trick, all right, but there won't be anything cheap
>>>>> about it, either in materiel or lives.
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Remember that billions of dollars of aid has come into Gaza over the
>>>>>> past
>>>>>> 15 years and almost all of it was used to build terror tunnels and
>>>>>> rocket
>>>>>> launchers. How will that be prevented this time? Won't a port just
>>>>>> accelerate and exacerbate this risk?" he posted on X. "And even with a
>>>>>> port, the humanitarian aid has to be loaded onto trucks to get to their
>>>>>> destination-- yes, the same trucks that Hamas is commandeering and
>>>>>> preventing from going to the right people!"
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly. We're going to spend billions building this port for Gaza (a
>>>>> city that essentially doesn't even exist anymore, FYI) and when it's
>>>>> finally open, any aid that's offloaded there will just be hijacked by
>>>>> Hamas after it leaves the port.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which will then lead Biden to say, "Well, I know I promised no American
>>>>> boots on the ground but we didn't foresee the problems with the aid
>>>>> after it leaves the port, so now we need to send in tanks, APCs, and
>>>>> troops to protect the aid until it gets to the people." And whammo, just
>>>>> like that we're in a shooting war in Gaza.
>>>>>
>>>>> If only Biden put this much effort into securing the southern border
>>>>> here in America...
>>>
>>>> YOU guys crafted the bill, then YOU guys shot your own bill down and now
>>>> want to pretend Biden is responsible for it.
>>>
>>> Biden is responsible for the entire border mess for the last three years
>>> since he took office. It wasn't Republicans who signed 94 EOs ordering
>>> everything from cutting holes in barriers so that illegal could have
>>> easier entry into the country, to ordering the Border Patrol to refrain
>>> from stopping illegals entering the country.
>>>
>>> Pretending three years later that he has nothing to do with the raging
>>> chaos that resulted from his EOs, and it's all the fault of Republicans
>>> whose RINO members crafted a bill that makes the problem worse, is
>>> idiotic. But it's a brilliant trick if you can find someone stupid
>>> enough to fall for it.
>>>
>>>> People aren't as stupid as you want them to be.
>>>
>>> No kidding. That's why we see right through this 'bipartisan border
>>> bill'.
>>>
>>>> Pretend all you like, we had a solution to the border problem.
>>>
>>> Allowing up to 8500 illegals per day to continue to flow unvetted into
>>> the country isn't a solution to the border problem under any definition
>>> of 'solution' in the English-speaking world, other than, I suppose, it
>>> would be legalized under this bill so I guess you could claim they can't
>>> be illegals if their entry was legalized and that would give a victory
>>> in the language war.
>>>
>> Again, Republicans put together a fix for the border.
> 
> Again, continuing to allow thousands of illegals unrestricted access to
> the nation is not a 'fix'. It's just leaving everything broken and
> pretending you fixed it.

You *DO* understand that, even if the bill had hermetically sealed the 
border and deported all current non-legals, it would *STILL* have been 
shot down like an escaping doe.  Not sure you should be celebrating...