Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17bc47bf3eac9d32$44836$1585792$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 04:07:24 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Katie Britt Delivers Republican Rebuttal To Biden's State Of The Union Speech
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <usf08c$1m3o8$7@dont-email.me> <17bb5d45f6ceb542$475$2601257$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com> <uskfca$307pd$12@dont-email.me> <6JyHN.48712$hN14.27793@fx17.iad> <usn0ii$3kncg$1@dont-email.me> <3CVHN.690299$p%Mb.470313@fx15.iad> <usqm3i$hnqa$6@dont-email.me>
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <usqm3i$hnqa$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 56
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:07:25 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2811
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17bc47bf3eac9d32$44836$1585792$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3192

On 3/12/24 5:48 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/12/24 5:53 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 3/11/24 8:22 AM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 3/11/24 3:51 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>> On 3/10/24 9:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>> On 3/10/24 5:30 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/8/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>>>> Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL), the youngest Republican woman ever 
>>>>>>> elected to the
>>>>>>> U.S. Senate, delivered an energetic rebuttal on Thursday night to 
>>>>>>> President
>>>>>>> Joe Biden’s highly criticized State of the Union address.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That was one of the funniest things I've seen it a long time. 
>>>>>> Hilarious actually.
>>>>>
>>>>> Her lies didn't even survive through the weekend.  So young, and 
>>>>> already a proven liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> She'll go far in the Republican party.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I started watching SNL about fifteen minutes in Sat. and thus missed 
>>>> the "cold opening."  People on social media were raving about 
>>>> Scarlet Johansson's take on Britt.  She was excellent, but the 
>>>> material itself didn't seem that funny other than it was good 
>>>> mimicry of Britt.  Britt herself was the real comedy act.  So pious, 
>>>> so fake.  I wonder what Oath Keeper Twat's email blast will tell him 
>>>> to say about her.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you see it finally?
>>>
>>> Selling bejeweled crosses on QVC.
>>>
>>> Migrants on the top shelf of your fridge.
>>>
>>> Everything was accurate... EXCEPT 1) when it happened  2) where it 
>>> happened and 3) who was president when it happened.
>>>
>>> And her delivery was spot on.
>>
>>
>> It was good. I didn't laugh though. Scarlett was amazing to do such a 
>> great job mimicking her on such short notice.
>>
> 
> I don't know about laughing, but my mouth did drop open.
> Scarlett did for Katie Britt what Tina Fey did for Sarah Palin.


It terms of the quality of the presentation, yes.  I think this is a 
one-off and won't become part of the national dialogue like Tina's did. 
That was something else.