Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<17bc47bf3eac9d32$44836$1585792$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 04:07:24 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Katie Britt Delivers Republican Rebuttal To Biden's State Of The Union Speech Content-Language: en-US Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <usf08c$1m3o8$7@dont-email.me> <17bb5d45f6ceb542$475$2601257$cad58068@news.newsdemon.com> <uskfca$307pd$12@dont-email.me> <6JyHN.48712$hN14.27793@fx17.iad> <usn0ii$3kncg$1@dont-email.me> <3CVHN.690299$p%Mb.470313@fx15.iad> <usqm3i$hnqa$6@dont-email.me> From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> In-Reply-To: <usqm3i$hnqa$6@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 56 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:07:25 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2811 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17bc47bf3eac9d32$44836$1585792$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3192 On 3/12/24 5:48 PM, FPP wrote: > On 3/12/24 5:53 AM, trotsky wrote: >> On 3/11/24 8:22 AM, FPP wrote: >>> On 3/11/24 3:51 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>> On 3/10/24 9:16 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>> On 3/10/24 5:30 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>> On 3/8/24 3:30 AM, Ubiquitous wrote: >>>>>>> Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL), the youngest Republican woman ever >>>>>>> elected to the >>>>>>> U.S. Senate, delivered an energetic rebuttal on Thursday night to >>>>>>> President >>>>>>> Joe Biden’s highly criticized State of the Union address. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That was one of the funniest things I've seen it a long time. >>>>>> Hilarious actually. >>>>> >>>>> Her lies didn't even survive through the weekend. So young, and >>>>> already a proven liar. >>>>> >>>>> She'll go far in the Republican party. >>>> >>>> >>>> I started watching SNL about fifteen minutes in Sat. and thus missed >>>> the "cold opening." People on social media were raving about >>>> Scarlet Johansson's take on Britt. She was excellent, but the >>>> material itself didn't seem that funny other than it was good >>>> mimicry of Britt. Britt herself was the real comedy act. So pious, >>>> so fake. I wonder what Oath Keeper Twat's email blast will tell him >>>> to say about her. >>>> >>> >>> Did you see it finally? >>> >>> Selling bejeweled crosses on QVC. >>> >>> Migrants on the top shelf of your fridge. >>> >>> Everything was accurate... EXCEPT 1) when it happened 2) where it >>> happened and 3) who was president when it happened. >>> >>> And her delivery was spot on. >> >> >> It was good. I didn't laugh though. Scarlett was amazing to do such a >> great job mimicking her on such short notice. >> > > I don't know about laughing, but my mouth did drop open. > Scarlett did for Katie Britt what Tina Fey did for Sarah Palin. It terms of the quality of the presentation, yes. I think this is a one-off and won't become part of the national dialogue like Tina's did. That was something else.