Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:55:51 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me> <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <utdl0p$19mot$1@dont-email.me> <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <utfn65$1nrjb$1@dont-email.me> <J_SdnRPRtZzf6mb4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <uthi9p$29328$6@dont-email.me> <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-79E7CE.10142621032024@news.giganews.com>
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-79E7CE.10142621032024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 52
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:55:54 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3158
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17bf2142c28c7c76$917$1588242$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3537

On 3/21/2024 1:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>,
>   moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman""
>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s
>>>>>>> <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still
>>>>>>>>> unauthorized?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people
>>>>>>> who were later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How does that logically hold up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
>>>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge
>>>>>> were obligated to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number
>>>>> of people who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply,
>>>>> it seems that as a matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized
>>>>> entry if the people in charge of authorizing you let you in.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. Not if one remains in the area he was let into.
>>>
>>> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries
>>> sure didn't.
>>>
>>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-janu
>>> ary-6-lies/index.html
>>
>> I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a
>> couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I
>> was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't
>> equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.
> 
> Which would be relevant if the people who were let in were actually the
> desk-sitters.

So, the guilt-threshold requires matching a rioter's DNA to his feces?