Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:38:16 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me> <20240319122424.00002ca9@example.com> <EvOdnfeMWpo2RWT4nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <utctt9$11hfm$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-266AD3.15011119032024@g9u1993c-hb.houston.hpicorp.net> <utd5p0$1371j$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F34389.17010519032024@g9u1993c-hb.houston.hpicorp.net> <utdc9v$14eu2$1@dont-email.me> <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <utevf0$1iacj$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <utevf0$1iacj$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 152
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:38:16 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 6905
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17bf30ab7c39ecc5$5$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 7282

On 3/20/24 10:30 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/19/24 10:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2024-03-20 00:01:05 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>
>>>> In article <utd5p0$1371j$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-03-19 22:01:11 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <utctt9$11hfm$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2024-03-19 18:25:47 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2024 at 9:24:24 AM PDT, "Rhino"
>>>>>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 04:30:48 -0400
>>>>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> NBC News presidential historian Michael Beschloss took the media
>>>>>>>>>> furor over former President Donald Trump’s "bloodbath" 
>>>>>>>>>> comments to
>>>>>>>>>> new heights during a Monday appearance on MSNBC's MORNING JOE.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> During an Ohio campaign rally over the weekend, Trump predicted a
>>>>>>>>>> "bloodbath" if he does not win reelection in 2024, and media 
>>>>>>>>>> outlets
>>>>>>>>>> fell all over themselves trying to make it look as though he was
>>>>>>>>>> predicting politically motivated violence and a *literal* 
>>>>>>>>>> bloodbath.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And yet there's a Democrat state senator in Tennessee outright 
>>>>>>>> calling
>>>>>>>> for riots and political violence right now because she didn't 
>>>>>>>> get her
>>>>>>>> way in a vote and... yes, you guessed it, crickets from the legacy
>>>>>>>> media.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe because she isn't powerful enough to inspire upwards of 80,000
>>>>>>> followers to attempt a violent insurrection in Washington or even
>>>>>>> Nashville.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So we have to wait until there's dead bodies in the street and 
>>>>>> downtown
>>>>>> Nashville is on fire before reporting on a state official calling for
>>>>>> riots and violence?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's what you're going with?
>>>>>
>>>>> I couldn't google the specific example of a "Democrat state senator in
>>>>> Tennessee outright calling for riots and political violence right now
>>>>> because she didn't get her way in a vote"
>>>>
>>>> Just check out the thread posted right here in RAT today entitled,
>>>> "Civility Project Ends".
>>>>
>>>>> but the Republican jerks in charge have passed some pretty outrageous
>>>>> laws in the past few weeks, like repealing an anti-"arrested for 
>>>>> driving
>>>>> while Black" law
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise known as an "exempting black people from the traffic code
>>>> everyone else has to obey" law.
>>>
>>> The law (or repealed law now) applies to everyone.
>>>
>>> If your state has this policy maybe you'll appreciate getting pulled
>>> over in your beaten up 40-year-old pickup without a license plate light
>>> because some cop makes the subjective judgement that you look
>>> suspicious.
>>
>> If I'm driving around without a license plate light, then there's nothing
>> subjective about it. I'm violating the law.
>>>
>>>> You do realize that's a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the
>>>> 14th Amendment, right? Or do you just not care?
>>>
>>> It had nothing to do with the 14th Amendment because it applied to
>>> everyone and all races.
>>
>> Ah, so it just repealed enforcement of the traffic code full stop because
>> "muh racism!"?
>>
>>> But your apparent closet racism by assuming it applied to only Blacks
>>> is interesting.
>>
>> If I assumed anything it's that the Tennessee law was a carbon copy of a
>> recent California bill proposed by a black assemblyman from Compton, 
>> which
>> specifically exempts only blacks from being stopped for most traffic
>> infractions, including speeding for anything short of 25mph over the 
>> posted
>> limit.
>>
>> This means if you have some lunatic blasting down a residential street at
>> 50mph, the cops would just have to stand by and watch it happen if the
>> driver is black.
>>
>> The bill would also render any evidence of other crimes discovered 
>> during a
>> traffic stop inadmissible. So if the speeder in the above hypothetical 
>> was
>> racing down the residential street at 60mph and could now be legally
>> stopped by police, and they discovered a dead murder victim in his back
>> seat, the body and any other evidence in the car would be inadmissible in
>> court at his murder trial.
>>
>> Again, only for blacks.
>>
>> So yeah, when these ridiculous laws and policy efforts spring up all 
>> around
>> the country at roughly the same time, they're usually carbon copies of 
>> each
>> other sent direct from BLM headquarters.
>>
>> Mea culpa.
>>
>>>
>>>>> that was passed after Tyre Nichols was beaten to death by police in
>>>>> 2023 after one of these kind of aggressive traffic stops
>>>>
>>>> By black cops. But go on with your "But muh racism!" nonsense.
>>>>
>>>>> and making unauthorized street protests a felony instead of a
>>>>> misdemeanor.
>>>>
>>>> Obviously misdemeanors weren't working.
>>>
>>> Making street protests felonies isn't going to work either, if the
>>> perceived transgression is egregious enough.
>>>
>>> It's a felony to enter the Capitol Building in an unauthorized manner
>>
>> No, it's a misdemeanor. 18 USC 1751, Restricted Buildings and Grounds. 
>> The
>> same statute I used to lock up White House fence jumpers.
>>
>>> and vandalize it and threaten members of Congress, did that work?
>>
>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still unauthorized?
>>
> 
> Yeah, the Jan 6'ers tried making that argument too.  They're in jail now.


I wonder if Twat calls them "hostages" like his main man Trump.  That's 
what's such a bummer about OKT, if you ask him a pointed question like 
this he just crawls back into the woodwork like cockroach he is.