Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17bf6e37e6780b72$41800$3716115$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:26:06 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Ketanji Jackson Worried That the 1st Amendment is Hamstringing Government Censorship
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <AbGcneZpLeuJ12f4nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <17bede76861e0687$3579$3121036$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-6D853D.13234321032024@news.giganews.com> <utjor7$2snlm$1@dont-email.me> <sR2dnWhJhaAPdGD4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <dc0tvil26o548mid7gub6olk07da5sprvh@4ax.com>
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <dc0tvil26o548mid7gub6olk07da5sprvh@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:26:09 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1736
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17bf6e37e6780b72$41800$3716115$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2159

On 3/23/2024 3:16 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:26:58 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 22, 2024 at 4:08:21 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> No, I don't. Every time you bring that up, I ask you whether you think that
>> it'd be okay for the government to make exceptions to Amendment XIX and
>> prohibit women from voting since "no amendment is sacrosanct", after all. Or
>> since "no amendment is sacrosanct", it'd be okay for the government to
>> prohibit black people from voting (Amendment XV) and allow people to be owned
>> as slaves (Amendment XIII).
>>
>> And that's when *you* go into a coma.
>>
> In other words the "reductio ad absurdem" argument where one defeats
> an argument by showing where the logical extension from it leads to an
> absurdity.

"SOME amendments are sacrosanct", a theologism, is what's absurd here.