Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:11:21 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me> <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <utdl0p$19mot$1@dont-email.me> <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <utfn65$1nrjb$1@dont-email.me> <J_SdnRPRtZzf6mb4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <uthi9p$29328$6@dont-email.me> <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com> <utjo6m$2sijg$1@dont-email.me> <j8ptvit6f596j0kaj3evg1iiou4r0l8t22@4ax.com> <17bf6efe87d228ca$37$3121036$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> <utuaqc$1p9hm$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <utuaqc$1p9hm$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 81
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:11:22 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 4434
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c05c6d2ce5b9ab$72541$1768716$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4821

On 3/26/2024 7:16 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/23/24 11:40 AM, moviePig wrote:
>> On 3/23/2024 10:22 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:57:24 -0400, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/21/24 12:51 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>> On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman""
>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s
>>>>>>>>>> <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>>>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still
>>>>>>>>>>>> unauthorized?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for
>>>>>>>>>> people who were
>>>>>>>>>> later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How does that logically hold up?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
>>>>>>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and
>>>>>>>>> judge
>>>>>>>>> were obligated to do so.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number
>>>>>>>> of people
>>>>>>>> who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it 
>>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>> that as a
>>>>>>>> matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the
>>>>>>>> people in
>>>>>>>> charge of authorizing you let you in.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Indeed.  Not if one remains in the area he was let into.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries
>>>>>> sure didn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission 
>>>>> that a
>>>>> couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in.  But what I
>>>>> was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building 
>>>>> doesn't
>>>>> equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.
>>>>
>>>> Breaking in the windows with a battering ram, and smashing the doors
>>>> down in kind of negates any "they allowed them in" argument.
>>>> Throwing aside cops and throwing barricades down is the same.
>>>>
>>>> If you walked in a broken door or window, just a few feet away from
>>>> where rioters were beating and brutalizing uniformed police officers, I
>>>> don't see ANY argument to be made that you weren't aware that what you
>>>> were doing was illegal.
>>>
>>> So you agree that the BLM "protests" were an insurrection.  Good to
>>> know.  Now if I could only find your posts decrying those events and
>>> demanding arrests.
>>>
>>> I *know* they must be out there somewhere.  Perhaps you could find and
>>> repost a few of them for us?
>>
>> Did you look under "Attempts To Undo A Presidential Election"?...
> 
> Protests against systematic murder of blacks by the State are different 
> from trying to overthrow a government by force and violence.

See no difference, hear no difference, speak no difference...