Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 13:07:09 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Mail-In Voting
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <68-cndeZBcdJV5n7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-02C92E.10572328032024@news.giganews.com> <uu6j76$b577$14@dont-email.me> <atropos-C94F52.11271729032024@news.giganews.com> <hd5e0jhgvifuqb437hutgp0vl04revgaos@4ax.com> <atropos-6BCDD3.13024929032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <mjbe0jdc0o8dq1qknqr5k0153b0rbkgai4@4ax.com> <atropos-77E27C.14434629032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <uu9fbs$13o15$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <uu9fbs$13o15$6@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 112
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:07:09 +0000
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c199cac1275c6b$105940$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>
X-Received-Bytes: 5869
Bytes: 5996

On 3/30/2024 12:41 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/29/24 5:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <mjbe0jdc0o8dq1qknqr5k0153b0rbkgai4@4ax.com>,
>>   shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:02:49 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <hd5e0jhgvifuqb437hutgp0vl04revgaos@4ax.com>,
>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:27:17 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <uu6j76$b577$14@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/28/24 1:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uu3vv9$3kt4j$1@dont-email.me>, FPP 
>>>>>>>> <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/24 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are 
>>>>>>>>>> trying
>>>>>>>>>> their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
>>>>>>>>> pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
>>>>>>>>> filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
>>>>>>>>> online so you can see it was received and accepted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
>>>>>>>>> others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
>>>>>>>> California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
>>>>>>>> And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
>>>>>>>> somehow be *losing* them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later 
>>>>>> reduce the
>>>>>> total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you 
>>>>>> count
>>>>>> them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and 
>>>>>> reduce the
>>>>>> total?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
>>>>>> checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples 
>>>>>> at the
>>>>>> last check-in than there were at the first?
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
>>>>> counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
>>>>> later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
>>>>> way to know just what happened.
>>>>
>>>> It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
>>>> see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
>>>> the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
>>>> trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
>>>
>>> Yet we keep running into this sort of thing:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0xbgHmfjj4
>>>
>>> Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
>>>
>>> Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
>>> that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
>>> about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
>>> decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
>>> found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
>>
>> You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
>> southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
>> gigantic voter fraud scheme.
>>
>> The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
>> likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
>>
> 
> 
> Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
> This is a fact.

Wait, weren't only eight of them illegal?  Give the guy a break...