Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17c269531be04100$157277$3716115$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:30:13 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Baltimore Bridge
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <54ecndjJKpe_QZn7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <66n90j98fa5ciafo546pd0t1fk7iasml2r@4ax.com> <uu2nbv$3b5vs$1@dont-email.me> <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-F8737E.11425728032024@news.giganews.com> <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me> <atropos-0FE527.10455929032024@news.giganews.com> <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1BE492.12585230032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad> <atropos-9A18E6.14101830032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-AFA6ED.13361531032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <uuefg5$2hcm5$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <uuefg5$2hcm5$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 126
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-1.netnews.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:30:14 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 6178
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c269531be04100$157277$3716115$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 6508

On 4/1/24 9:14 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 3/31/24 4:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
>>>>    trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>       "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore bridge.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agency foot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuck the taxpayer.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amirite? So what will its new name be?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bridge".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> company/insurance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to
>>>>>>>>>>> read.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridg
>>>>>>>>>>> e/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be
>>>>>>>>>>> rebuilt. It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> sure the piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when 
>>>>>>>>>> I was a
>>>>>>>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with 
>>>>>>>>>> seemingly
>>>>>>>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost 
>>>>>>>>>> control.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels 
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> sea level rise
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea
>>>>>>>>>> level rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street 
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> me; when I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the 
>>>>>>>>>> ocean was
>>>>>>>>>> in the same place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years 
>>>>>>>>>> earlier
>>>>>>>>>> (despite AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 
>>>>>>>>>> 2011);
>>>>>>>>>> Plymouth Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the 
>>>>>>>>>> base of
>>>>>>>>>> the Statue of Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, 
>>>>>>>>>> etc., etc.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
>>>>>>> everything around us goes to shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
>>>>>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
>>>>>> underwater by 2011,
>>>>>
>>>>> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
>>>>
>>>> Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
>>>> of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
>>>> results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
>>>>
>>>> Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
>>>> whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. 
>>>> It's
>>>> kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
>>>>
>>> You've been told this for decades.
>>
>> You're claiming I've been told for decades that Hutt couldn't find
>> anything about enviro-kooks pushing sea-level rise on Google?
>>
>> Do tell...
>>
>> (Your bullshit doesn't even make coherent sense anymore.)
>>
> 
> Nope, I claimed no such thing.  You've been shown evidence for decades 
> that man made climate change would devastate the planet.
> 
> Well, now it is.  And you still can't admit you were wrong, and it's 
> still happening.


I think Twat has a Baltimore Bridge he'd like to sell us.