Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17c2d8242c00cc24$139915$3265$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:20:56 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: BLM and Rittenhouse
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <N4mcnaBh6rVOdJj7nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com> <uu6ij9$b577$7@dont-email.me> <atropos-2369F7.11202429032024@news.giganews.com> <17c1554881e6f860$47316$3081049$52d51861@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-7EDDE0.13333629032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <03en0jpsu4ilqgok615mt8t1a6jfp6poe0@4ax.com> <17c2979931d751bb$80145$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-F143EC.16151402042024@news.giganews.com> <17c2a38abc279064$139627$3265$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com> <c78q0jpsv66rceqifuqdmukc510j57jne4@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <c78q0jpsv66rceqifuqdmukc510j57jne4@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 18:20:58 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2666
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c2d8242c00cc24$139915$3265$48d50260@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3045

On 4/3/2024 5:36 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:17:03 -0400, moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> 
>>>> If a society inherits a racist component, as ours has, what measures can
>>>> address it that can't be (mis)labeled 'racist' by those so inclined?
>>>
>>> Your question rests on a false premise with your use of the word
>>> 'mislabeled'.
>>
>> Your best response is to cavil at my parenthetical editorializing?
>>
> If despite the racial progress made both legally and in every other
> way is STILL considered racist (and the BLM people DO demonize MLK for
> advocating equality of opportunity rather than equality of results)
> then why persist with legal equality?
> 
> Obviously that's a rhetorical question but my point is that the BLM +
> company definition of "justice" and "equality" (which is the same as
> the DEI definition which is 'equality of results" not opportunity) is
> positively obscene.
> 
> Go back and re-read the ENTIRE "I have a dream" speech and don't just
> pay attention to the last minute of it (which is all most of us
> remember). If you pay attention to the first half of the speech you'll
> see King rips several states quite hard for racism before he gets to
> the part about his children that we all remember.
> 
> https://www.npr.org/2010/01/18/122701268/i-have-a-dream-speech-in-its-entirety
> 
> For my money the first half is at least as important as his inspiring
> finale.

The rub occurs when "racist" measures are needed to hasten the advent of 
equal opportunity.  E.g., for blacks to be accepted as doctors, a few 
have to be coerced into (also coerced) medical schools.