Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:37:39 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <utks3h$35980$1@dont-email.me> <17c37b6c29057425$4757$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <25Ccnb-dnerIwo37nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3845f233a098e$3282$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com> <0B2dnfnk4IawGI37nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-A4D504.11411606042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp> <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-8F2975.20213706042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp> <uv0vc7$3hsmc$4@dont-email.me> <atropos-AB461C.13281108042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp>
Content-Language: en-US
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-AB461C.13281108042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 54
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 21:37:41 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3454
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c46bc72d8ba76b$33827$3384359$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3835

On 4/8/2024 4:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <uv0vc7$3hsmc$4@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/6/24 11:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>>    moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/6/2024 2:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>>>>     moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/5/2024 7:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Apr 5, 2024 at 3:57:07 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/5/2024 4:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>      moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What *opinion* -- of anything anywhere -- can't be contradicted?
>>>>>>>>>> Fyi, *that* would be a violation of 'free speech'...
>>>>>>>>>      
>>>>>>>>> No one's muzzling or prohibiting you from making contradictory
>>>>>>>>> statements regarding the SCOTUS ruling. However, your right to free
>>>>>>>>> speech doesn't immunize you from being wrong or bar others from
>>>>>>>>> pointing out your wrongness.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...where "wrongness" means "of differing opinion".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can have an opinion that SCOTUS decided wrongly and wish it had
>>>>>>> made a different ruling but you can't have an opinion that the law is
>>>>>>> other than it is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The 'law' is what SCOTUS has opinions about. I can have *my* opinion
>>>>>> about either or both. Therein, the only "wrong" would be a misquoting.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, the law is what it is and it's not what you claim. You can have your
>>>>> own opinions but you can't have your own facts.
>>>>
>>>> No? The law *isn't* text that SCOTUS has opinions about? ...as I may?
>>>
>>> No, SCOTUS opinions become the law.
> 
>> Corrupt and illegitimate courts make corrupt and illegitimate laws.
> 
> The court that decided the Skokie case (which is what we're talking
> about here) was full of leftists. Weird that you'd be calling them
> corrupt and/or that their decisions are illegitimate.
> 
> I guess that's all you have left in your zeal to pretend we have laws
> against 'hate speech' in America.

Nobody has pretended we have such laws.  In fact, the genesis of this 
snipe hunt was my riposte to FPP's claim that there *are* no such laws.