Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<17c73268ed9f48a8$36255$2544727$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:40:08 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Pro-Hamas Protesters Block Golden Gate
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <YC-dnU_bwqceUoP7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <45mt1jlaape87smut5bnqgmbbrc39ba3np@4ax.com> <TwqdnTahxJoZgYL7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c6f06df3453148$950$1354752$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-CFC2B8.11492117042024@news.giganews.com> <17c72bb49743e7f4$7435$2044614$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-F0198A.13574417042024@news.giganews.com> <17c72e0305dd306d$36254$2544727$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-CC9911.15192017042024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: moviePig <never@nothere.com>
In-Reply-To: <atropos-CC9911.15192017042024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 70
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 22:40:09 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 3973
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c73268ed9f48a8$36255$2544727$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 4382

On 4/17/2024 6:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article
> <17c72e0305dd306d$36254$2544727$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>,
>   moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/17/2024 4:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <17c72bb49743e7f4$7435$2044614$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>>    moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/17/2024 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <17c6f06df3453148$950$1354752$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>>>>     moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/16/2024 8:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:20:35 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Traffic backed up for miles. Why don't the cops just drag them away
>>>>>>>>> and arrest them?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://x.com/trscoop/status/1779928676437565903
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, I was under the impression that it was a huge crowd of people.
>>>>>>>> Which would have explained why the cops didn't do anything since it's
>>>>>>>> difficult to place hundreds or thousands of people under arrest.
>>>>>>>> Didn't realize it was just a few people.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh, yeah. It's San Francisco. Run by radical leftists. City officials
>>>>>>>>> are probably cheering the protesters on and will give them a medal
>>>>>>>>> later.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 'Memba when Chris Christie allowed a bridge to be blocked and we were
>>>>>>>>> told it was a national emergency and a crime against humanity? 'Cause
>>>>>>>>> I do.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Once again we see that if your politics pass the ideological rigor of
>>>>>>>>> the Left, you're allowed to do whatever you want.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Doesn't matter whether they support the protestors or not. They
>>>>>>>> shouldn't be allowed to block traffic like that. It has the potential
>>>>>>>> to put people's lives at risk. People who have nothing to do with what
>>>>>>>> is happening in Gaza.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Plus who the hell is going to pro-Hamas. Pro Palestine I understand as
>>>>>>>> those are just people wanting to go about their lives like anyone
>>>>>>>> else. Hamas , on the other hand, is very much a terrorist organization
>>>>>>>> and should not be supported by anyone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Except the people of Palestine-- all the 'innocents' we keep hearing so
>>>>>>> much about voted Hamas in and recent polling shows that they want Hamas
>>>>>>> to continue to run things in Gaza when the it's all over.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds like they support Hamas just fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Polling"? Is that like when your vote is public for Hamas to see?
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> It's not? 'Cuz the pollster will keep your opinions to himself?
>>>
>>> No, just your identity.
>>
>> You hope. And upon which you bet your life.
> 
> Well, if you don't tell the pollster who you are and only provide your
> viewpoint...

....and know who the *pollster* is, and do your interview in secret...