Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:29:33 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: BIDEN: "Trump Won't Denounce Political Violence!"
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
References: <R7SdnYbK0udVhZP7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <uvgtgb$3n4e9$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-6EF449.11434814042024@news.giganews.com> <uviopq$6e9c$1@dont-email.me> <zPGcnYse4sDgq4D7nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com> <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-050713.12112716042024@news.giganews.com> <uvog6v$1jt55$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-015536.12025017042024@news.giganews.com> <uvrgkh$2bcsg$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-2B2633.09371418042024@ec2-18-101-80-69.eu-south-2.compute.amazonaws.com> <17c7f99f2940cd2a$68473$2544727$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <v00ggp$3mif6$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
In-Reply-To: <v00ggp$3mif6$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 136
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 16:29:33 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 6342
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17c809ed6a17c203$78108$4052113$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 6722

On 4/20/24 8:38 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 4/20/24 7:30 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 4/18/24 11:37 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <uvrgkh$2bcsg$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/17/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <uvog6v$1jt55$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <uvlpfs$u7hv$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/14/24 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <uvgtgb$3n4e9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15:20 PM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/24 12:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:53:43 AM PDT, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/6/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you still haven't explained why Biden hasn't 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> denounced any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of them, since he's decreed that denouncing political 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the duty of every president.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [Fred Phelps citing headline]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protests
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, I thought Antifa didn't exist? Now you're claiming 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that Biden has condemned them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow. Baby steps, I guess.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or do they only exist to the extent you can win on Usenet 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> today?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a concept, but not as an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! So it was a concept that was trying to burn down the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> federal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> courthouse every night in Portland during the 2020 Summer 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Love,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm so confused about Fred Phelps' position here. These 
>>>>>>>>>>>> large-scale
>>>>>>>>>>>> protests that included violence, arson, and vandalism were 
>>>>>>>>>>>> organized
>>>>>>>>>>>> through Twitter by people forwarding tweets. An 
>>>>>>>>>>>> "organization" is a
>>>>>>>>>>>> body that organizes something. A protest was organized by those
>>>>>>>>>>>> tweeting.
>>>>>>>>>>> Of course Effa is full of it here. Even his fellow leftists 
>>>>>>>>>>> recognize
>>>>>>>>>>> Antifa as a thing, not just some ephemeral 'concept'.
>>>>>>>>>>> He acts like since they don't issue membership cards they're 
>>>>>>>>>>> not a
>>>>>>>>>>> group.
>>>>>>>>>>>> fact that they worked in concert is what made them an 
>>>>>>>>>>>> organization,
>>>>>>>>>>>> even without being organized as a corporation, partnership, or
>>>>>>>>>>>> unincorporated society with charters and bylaws and other 
>>>>>>>>>>>> organic
>>>>>>>>>>>> documents. Working together by passing the word along is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> what made
>>>>>>>>>>>> them an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a means of organizing among those doing the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> organizing.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is actual, not conceptual. Working together toward a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> common
>>>>>>>>>>>> purpose is all that's necessary to be an organization.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Two dumbfucks don't make a right.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two
>>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and
>>>>>>>> defend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking
>>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an 
>>>>>>> oath to
>>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Constitution written in 1787. Ratified 1788. Met 1789.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which mean there was no Congress until at least 1789, not 1787 as you
>>>>> claimed above.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any questions?
>>>>
>>>> All I mentioned was a date. I made no claim.
>>>
>>> I asked since when has Congress had any credibility and you gave me a
>>> date in which Congress didn't even exist.
>>>
>>> Reading trouble? Again?
>>
>>
>> Sounds more like not giving a shit about what you're blathering about. 
>> Hope this helps.
> 
> 
> He's bitching about when Congress was Congress.  I don't get what any of 
> that has to do with anything.  We were debating the credibility of 
> Congress:
> 
> 
>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two ignorant 
>> fucks bitching and whining on Usenet.
> 
> Somehow that devolved into an excursion into the validity of dates.


I've been on some dates like that.  I'm sure Twat has too, with his Oath 
Keeper buddies.  What Oath do they claim to be keeping I wonder.